Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39127800›Full record

ArticleEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2025

The comparison between intratympanic gentamicin prehabilitation and postoperative virtual reality exposure to standard vestibular training in patients with vestibular schwannoma.

Markéta Bonaventurová, Zuzana Balatková, Květoslav Červený, Rudolf Černý, Veronika Bandúrová, Vladimír Koucký, Lenka Peterková, Zdeněk Fík, Martin Komarc, Eva Mrázková and 2 more

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Markéta BonaventurováDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague and Motol University Hospital, V Úvalu 84, Prague, 150 06, Czech Republic.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3283-0503
Zuzana BalatkováDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague and Motol University Hospital, V Úvalu 84, Prague, 150 06, Czech Republic. zuzana.balatkova@fnmotol.cz.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1121-9836
Květoslav ČervenýDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague and Motol University Hospital, V Úvalu 84, Prague, 150 06, Czech Republic.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4819-9069
Rudolf ČernýDepartment of Neurology, 2nd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Motol University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6583-0836
Veronika BandúrováDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague and Motol University Hospital, V Úvalu 84, Prague, 150 06, Czech Republic.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1754-7737
Vladimír KouckýDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague and Motol University Hospital, V Úvalu 84, Prague, 150 06, Czech Republic.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6089-0071
Lenka PeterkováDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague and Motol University Hospital, V Úvalu 84, Prague, 150 06, Czech Republic.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0007-1961-3359
Zdeněk FíkDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague and Motol University Hospital, V Úvalu 84, Prague, 150 06, Czech Republic.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4243-9727
Martin KomarcDepartment of Anthropomotorics and Methodology, Faculty of Physical Education and Sport, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4106-5217
Eva MrázkováDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Havířov Hospital, Havířov, Czech Republic.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7488-1603
Jan PlzákDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague and Motol University Hospital, V Úvalu 84, Prague, 150 06, Czech Republic.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3710-4455
Zdeněk ČadaDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, The Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, University Hospital Motol, Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6062-6820

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveResection of the vestibular schwannoma causes acute peripheral vestibular loss. The process of central compensation starts immediately afterward. The rehabilitation goal is to support this process and restore the quality of life. MATERIALS AND

methodsIn this prospective single-center study, 67 consecutive patients underwent vestibular schwannoma resection (40 females, mean age 52 ± 12 years). The patients were divided into three groups: the prehabilitation with intratympanic gentamicin group, the virtual reality group (optokinetic stimulation via virtual reality goggles in the first ten days after the surgery), and the control group. All patients were examined with objective methods and completed questionnaires before the prehabilitation, before the surgery, at the hospital discharge, and after three months.

resultsIntratympanic gentamicin prehabilitation leads ipsilaterally to a significant aVOR reduction in all semicircular canals (p < 0.050), the increase of the unilateral weakness in air calorics (p = 0.026), and loss of cVEMPs responses (p = 0.017). Prehabilitation and postoperative exposure to virtual reality scenes improved the patient's perception of vertigo problems according to Dizziness Handicap Inventory (p = 0.039 and p = 0.076, respectively). These findings conform with the optokinetic testing results, which showed higher slow phase velocities at higher speeds (40 deg/s) in both targeted groups compared to the control group.

conclusionPreoperative intratympanic gentamicin positively affects peripheral vestibular function, influencing balance perception after VS resection. In long-term follow-up, prehabilitation and postoperative exposure to virtual reality improve patients' quality of life in the field of vertigo problems.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsGentamicinsNeuroma, AcousticPreoperative CareVirtual RealityVirtual Reality Exposure TherapyAdultAgedFemaleHumansInjection, IntratympanicMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesQuality of LifeTreatment OutcomeAnti-Bacterial AgentsGentamicinsIntratympanic gentamicinOptokinetic testsPrehabilitationVestibular schwannomaVideo head impulse testVirtual reality

Identifiers

PMID39127800
PMCPMC11735475

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.