Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39127723›Full record

ReviewJournal of anesthesia, analgesia and critical care2024

Anesthesiologists ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia core curriculum: a Delphi consensus from Italian regional anesthesia experts.

Alessandro De Cassai, Astrid Behr, Dario Bugada, Danilo Canzio, Gianluca Capelleri, Fabio Costa, Giorgio Danelli, Grazia De Angelis, Romualdo Del Buono, Fabrizio Fattorini and 16 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of anesthesia, analgesia and critical care, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

26 authors.

Alessandro De CassaiAnesthesia and Intensive Care Unit "Sant'Antonio", University Hospital of Padua, Padua, Italy. alessandro.decassai@gmail.com.
Astrid BehrDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Camposampiero Hospital, ULSS 6 Euganea Padova, Camposampiero, Italy.
Dario BugadaDepartment of Emergency and Intensive Care, ASST Papa Giovanni XXIII, Bergamo, Italy.
Danilo CanzioDepartment of Anesthesia and Intensive Care Unit and Pain Therapy, Mater Dei Hospital, Bari, Italy.
Gianluca CapelleriAnesthesia, Intensive Care and Pain Therapy, Policlinico Di Monza, Monza, Italy.
Fabio CostaUnit of Anesthesia, Intensive Care and Pain Management, Campus Bio-Medico University Hospital Foundation, Rome, Italy.
Giorgio DanelliGVM Care and Research Maria Cecilia Hospital, Cotignola, Italy.
Grazia De AngelisIRCCS Casa Sollievo Della Sofferenza, Foggia, Italy.
Romualdo Del BuonoUnit of Anesthesia, Intensive Care and Pain Management, ASST Gaetano Pini, Milan, Italy.
Fabrizio FattoriniAnaesthesiology, Critical Care Medicine and Pain Therapy, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Pierfrancesco FuscoDepartment of Anesthesia, Intensive Care and Pain Medicine, SS. Filippo E Nicola Hospital, Avezzano, L'Aquila, Italy.
Fabio GoriUniversity Hospital Santa Maria Della Misericordia, Udine, Italy.
Alberto ManasseroUnit of Anesthesia, Casa Di Cura Città Di Bra, Cuneo, Italy.
Ilaria PaciniUnit of Anaesthesia and Pain Therapy, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Pediatrics, Sant'Orsola-Malpighi University Hospital, Bologna, Italy.
Giuseppe PascarellaUnit of Anesthesia, Intensive Care and Pain Management, Campus Bio-Medico University Hospital Foundation, Rome, Italy.
Mauro Proietti Pannunzi, Casa Di Cura Villa Dei Pini, Civitanova Marche, Italy.
Gianluca RussoAnesthesia and Intensive Care, ASST Lodi, Lodi, Italy.
Raffaele RussoIRCCS, Casa Sollievo Della Sofferenza, San Giovanni Rotondo, Italy.
Domenico Pietro SantonastasoAnesthesia Unit, Ospedale Bufalini, Cesena, Italy.
Marco ScardinoOrtho Center, Humanitas Research Hospital, Milan, Italy.
Giuseppe SepolvereDepartment of Anesthesia and Cardiac Surgery Intensive Care Unit, San Michele Hospital, Maddaloni, Caserta, Italy.
Paolo ScimiaDepartment of Anesthesia and Intensive Care Unit, G. Mazzini Hospital, Teramo, Italy.
Alessandro StrumiaUnit of Anesthesia, Intensive Care and Pain Management, Campus Bio-Medico University Hospital Foundation, Rome, Italy.
Mario TedescoDepartment of Anesthesia and Intensive Care Unit and Pain Therapy, Mater Dei Hospital, Bari, Italy.
Andrea TognùUnit of Anesthesia, Intensive Care and Pain Management, ASST Gaetano Pini, Milan, Italy.
Vito TorranoDepartment of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe need for a standardized core curriculum in regional anesthesia has become essential, particularly with the integration of ultrasound revolutionizing and exponentially increasing clinical practice and possibilities. In fact, numerous novel techniques, often overlapping, can confuse practitioners. This study aims to establish a core curriculum for upper limb, lower limb, paraspinal and fascial plane blocks for residency training, addressing potential educational gaps caused by the multitude of techniques, through a Delphi consensus process involving recognized Italian regional anesthesia experts.

methodsA steering committee was formed in order to select a panel of experts in regional anesthesia. A three-round Delphi consensus was planned: two rounds of electronic voting and a final round of mixed electronic voting and round table discussion. The consensus was defined as ≥ 75% agreement for inclusion and lower than ≤ 25% agreement for exclusion from the core curriculum list. Techniques reaching the 50% threshold were included with low consensus.

resultsTwenty-nine techniques were selected to be included in the ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia core curriculum. Twenty-two were included with strong consensus: Upper limb: interscalene brachial plexus block, supraclavicular brachial plexus block, infraclavicular brachial plexus block, axillary brachial plexus block, intermediate cervical plexus block Lower limb: femoral nerve block, pericapsular nerve group block, adductor canal block, sciatic nerve block (transgluteal approach, infragluteal approach, and at the popliteal fossa), ankle block Paraspinal/fascial plane blocks: erector spinae plane block, deep serratus anterior plane block, superficial pectointercostal plane block, interpectoral plane block, pectoserratus plane block, rectus sheath block, ilioinguinal iliohypogastric nerves block, transversus abdominis plane block (with subcostal and midaxillary approaches) The remaining seven techniques were included with low consensus: superficial cervical plexus block, lumbar plexus block, fascia iliaca block (suprainguinal approach), anterior quadratus lumborum block, lateral quadratus lumborum block, paravertebral block, and serratus anterior plane block.

conclusionsThis curriculum aims to standardize training and ensure that residents acquire the essential skills required for effective and safe practice regardless of the residents' subsequent specialization. By incorporating these techniques, educational programs can provide a structured and consistent approach to regional anesthesia, enhancing the quality of patient care and improving outcomes.

Indexed as

Core curriculumEducationRegional anesthesiaResidentsStandardizeTraining

Identifiers

PMID39127723
PMCPMC11316303

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.