ArticleRespiratory research2024
Distinct enterotypes and dysbiosis: unraveling gut microbiota in pulmonary and critical care medicine inpatients.
Article in Respiratory research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- A novel enterotype enriched with respiratory super-dominant pathobionts is associated with immunosuppression in pulmonary tuberculosis patients.Journal of translational medicine · 2026Article
- Harnessing Microbiome-Mediated and Macrophage-Driven Mechanisms for Oral Wound Healing.Microorganisms · 2026Review
- Association of birth weight with lung function and the mediating role of gut microbiota: A STROBE 2-step Mendelian randomization study.Medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe gut-lung axis, pivotal for respiratory health, is inadequately explored in pulmonary and critical care medicine (PCCM) inpatients.
methodsExamining PCCM inpatients from three medical university-affiliated hospitals, we conducted 16S ribosomal RNA sequencing on stool samples (inpatients, n = 374; healthy controls, n = 105). We conducted statistical analyses to examine the gut microbiota composition in PCCM inpatients, comparing it to that of healthy controls. Additionally, we explored the associations between gut microbiota composition and various clinical factors, including age, white blood cell count, neutrophil count, platelet count, albumin level, hemoglobin level, length of hospital stay, and medical costs.
resultsPCCM inpatients exhibited lower gut microbiota diversity than healthy controls. Principal Coordinates Analysis revealed marked overall microbiota structure differences. Four enterotypes, including the exclusive Enterococcaceae enterotype in inpatients, were identified. Although no distinctions were found at the phylum level, 15 bacterial families exhibited varying abundances. Specifically, the inpatient population from PCCM showed a significantly higher abundance of Enterococcaceae, Lactobacillaceae, Erysipelatoclostridiaceae, Clostridiaceae, and Tannerellaceae. Using random forest analyses, we calculated the areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUCs) to be 0.75 (95% CIs 0.69-0.80) for distinguishing healthy individuals from inpatients. The four most abundant genera retained in the classifier were Blautia, Subdoligranulum, Enterococcus, and Klebsiella.
conclusionsEvidence of gut microbiota dysbiosis in PCCM inpatients underscores the gut-lung axis's significance, promising further avenues in respiratory health research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.