ArticleBMC primary care2024
The effect of family physician team processes on chronic disease management performance from a structural network perspective.
Article in BMC primary care, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Association between family doctor contract services and management status among patients with hypertension or diabetes in a multi-ethnic Province of China.BMC primary care · 2025Article
- The effect of follow-up on the blood pressure control: a longitudinal study in rural areas of China.Population health metrics · 2025Article
- Effect of Team Composition on Integrated Care Within Multidisciplinary Family Doctor Teams in China: Inter-Professional Collaboration as Mediator.International journal of integrated careArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveThe family physician team has become the core carrier for delivery primary health care in China. This study aimed to measure the effect of the network structural characteristics of family physician team processes on health performance. Strategic recommendations for optimizing the family physician team processes with a view to improving performance were presented.
methodsA cross-sectional survey was conducted from October to December 2021 in Qianjiang in Hubei Province and Changsha in Hunan Province. Task performance, contextual performance, social networks, and sociodemographic characteristics were collected. Social network analysis was conducted to calculate density and centralization, then hierarchical linear regression analysis was employed to explore the relationship between the network structural characteristics of family physician team processes and performance.
resultsIn total, 88 family physician teams attended in this investigation. The transition processes of family physician team showed a distinctive low density (0.272 ± 0.112), high centralization (0.866 ± 0.197) network structure. For family physician team, the density of action processes significantly and positively affected task performance (B = 0.600, P < 0.05); the centralization of action processes positively affected task performance (B = 0.604, P < 0.01); the density of action processes positively affected contextual performance (B = 0.545, P < 0.01); the density of interpersonal processes significantly and positively affected contextual performance (B = 0.326, P < 0.05).
conclusionThe network density and centralization of family physician team processes have positive effects on chronic disease management performance. The results from this study help to enhance our conceptual understanding of social network and its implications for team-dynamics. Optimizing family physician team processes is an effective way to strengthen the construction of family physician team and promote the quality and efficiency of family physician-contracted service. It is recommended to strengthen the management of team processes, enhance the internal collaboration mechanism, and optimize the centralized network structure of family physician team.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.