Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39127391›Full record

SynthesisThe ocular surface2024

Punctal cautery in dry eye disease: A systematic review.

Ashish Ranjan, Sayan Basu, Swati Singh

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The ocular surface, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ashish RanjanHariram Motumal Nasta and Renu Hariram Nasta Ophthalmic Plastic Surgery Services, LV Prasad Eye Institute, Hyderabad, Telangana, India.
Sayan BasuProf. Brien Holden Eye Research Centre (BHERC), LV Prasad Eye Institute, Hyderabad, Telangana, India.
Swati SinghHariram Motumal Nasta and Renu Hariram Nasta Ophthalmic Plastic Surgery Services, LV Prasad Eye Institute, Hyderabad, Telangana, India; Prof. Brien Holden Eye Research Centre (BHERC), LV Prasad Eye Institute, Hyderabad, Telangana, India. Electronic address: swatisingh@lvpei.org.

Funding

DBT-Wellcome Trust India Alliance IA/CPHE/21/1/505970Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo critically appraise the evidence on the efficacy and recanalization rates of permanent punctal occlusion via thermal or surgical means in managing dry eye disease (DED).

methodsIn PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane databases, two authors systematically reviewed the literature for prospective studies on punctal cautery or surgical occlusion (excluding punctal plugs) for DED. The studied outcomes were changes in tear volume, tear film stability, punctal recanalization rates, and patient symptomatology.

resultsNine studies (all single-arm) had 150 subjects (96 females). Five studies were on thermal punctal cauterization, and four used surgical occlusion techniques. One hundred eighty puncta were operated for eyes not responding to maximal lubricants or recurrent plug extrusion. DED etiologies were Sjogren's syndrome (78), cicatricial ADDE (27), graft-versus-host disease (12), and non-SS DED (50). Follow-up ranged from 3 to 24 months. At the final follow-up, improvements in Schirmer I and TBUT were 2.5 mm and 0.8s with thermal and 2.1 mm and 0.6s with surgical methods, respectively (P = 0.17 for Schirmer, P = 0.18 for TBUT). Punctal recanalization rates varied between thermal (0-38.7 %) and surgical (5-9%) techniques (p = 0.22). Different cautery devices show different recanalization rates; disposable thermal cautery tips directly inserted into the punctum had lesser recanalization than radiofrequency monopolar cautery. Most patients reported subjective improvement following the procedure, but no quantification measure was given in the studies. None of the published studies had a comparison group for performing a meta-analysis.

conclusionBased on non-comparative studies, thermal or surgical punctal occlusion improves tear volume in DED with similar recanalization rates; however, randomized controlled trials are needed to ascertain the real effects of punctal cautery on DED.

Indexed as

CauteryDry Eye SyndromesHumansLacrimal ApparatusOphthalmologic Surgical ProceduresPunctal PlugsTearsDry eye diseasePunctal cauterizationPunctal cauteryPunctal occlusionSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID39127391
PMCPMC7617785

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.