ArticleThe ocular surface2024
Development and validation of a method to generate phenol red thread tests.
Article in The ocular surface, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Prevalence and management practices of ophthalmic lesions in laboratory mice.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Modulation of corneal sensory processing and pain responses by dry eye and corneal wounding.Frontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2026Article
- MSC-encapsulated porous microparticle eye drops for autoimmune dry eye disease treatment in NOD mice.Science advances · 2025Article
- Meibomian gland lipid alterations and ocular surface sequela in Awat2 knockout murine model of meibomian gland dysfunction and evaporative dry eye disease.The ocular surface · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThe aim of this study was to develop and validate a method to generate phenol red thread tests (PRTT) due to the lack of availability of commercial PRTT.
methodsWhite cotton thread was dyed with phenol red (pH indicator) for 48 h, dried, cut, and sterilized. To validate its wicking ability, the thread was inserted into solutions of varying pH, flanking the pH of healthy tears, for different time intervals. To assess its diagnostic utility, PRTTs were performed in vivo on wildtype and a murine model of evaporative dry eye, acyl-coA: wax alcohol acyltransferase 2 knockout (Awat2 KO) mice.
resultsTwo batches of PRTT were produced that had a similar appearance and function to the commercial product. In vitro testing revealed no significant differences in the wicking kinetics at any time point across the pH solutions for batch 1 and only one difference for batch 2 (pH 7.4 vs 7.8 at 5 s, P = 0.029). When comparing both batches, similar wicking kinetics were found with only two significant differences identified (pH 7.6 at 40 s and pH 7.8 at 35 s, P < 0.01). In vivo, our PRTT yielded similar measurements to the commercial PRTT in wildtype and Awat2 KO mice and detected a significant increase in aqueous tear volume in the Awat2 KO mice (commercial: P = 0.015, our PRTT: P = 0.002).
conclusionOur method provides a reproducible diagnostic test that performs similarly to its commercial counterpart in a relevant dry eye model indicating that it can serve as a valid and reliable replacement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.