ArticleCell reports methods2024
Discovery and generalization of tissue structures from spatial omics data.
Article in Cell reports methods, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Histopathology-centered computational evolution of spatial omics: integration, mapping, and foundation models.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2026Review
- Using spatial proteomics to enhance cell type assignments in histology images.Cell reports methods · 2025Article
- ROSIE: AI generation of multiplex immunofluorescence staining from histopathology images.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Quantifying and interpreting biologically meaningful spatial signatures within tumor microenvironments.NPJ precision oncology · 2025Review
- Identification and characterization of cell niches in tissue from spatial omics data at single-cell resolution.Nature communications · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Tissues are organized into anatomical and functional units at different scales. New technologies for high-dimensional molecular profiling in situ have enabled the characterization of structure-function relationships in increasing molecular detail. However, it remains a challenge to consistently identify key functional units across experiments, tissues, and disease contexts, a task that demands extensive manual annotation. Here, we present spatial cellular graph partitioning (SCGP), a flexible method for the unsupervised annotation of tissue structures. We further present a reference-query extension pipeline, SCGP-Extension, that generalizes reference tissue structure labels to previously unseen samples, performing data integration and tissue structure discovery. Our experiments demonstrate reliable, robust partitioning of spatial data in a wide variety of contexts and best-in-class accuracy in identifying expertly annotated structures. Downstream analysis on SCGP-identified tissue structures reveals disease-relevant insights regarding diabetic kidney disease, skin disorder, and neoplastic diseases, underscoring its potential to drive biological insight and discovery from spatial datasets.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.