ArticleComputers in biology and medicine2024
Multimodal speech biomarkers for remote monitoring of ALS disease progression.
Article in Computers in biology and medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Powering Neurology Drug Development Trials to Reduce False Negative Results.Clinical and translational science · 2026Review
- Digital Remote Assessment of Motor and Speech Changes in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis: Longitudinal Observational Study.JMIR formative research · 2026Observational
- Speech-based digital endpoints track ALS progression and align with standard clinical outcomes: evidence from the VRG50635 trial.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Home-based transcranial static magnetic field stimulation - concept, development, and clinical applications: IFCN handbook chapter.Clinical neurophysiology practice · 2026Review
- Feasibility study on a noninvasive assessment of ALS patient emotional state.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Article
- Construct Validity of the Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Bulbar Dysfunction Index-Remote.American journal of speech-language pathology · 2025Article
- Remote Monitoring of Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Using Digital Health Technologies: Shifting Toward Digitalized Care and Research?Neurology · 2025Review
- Bridging neuro-biomarkers and MR imaging: The synergistic role of glial fibrillary acidic protein in early CNS disease diagnosis.IBRO neuroscience reports · 2025Review
- Vocal and Facial Behavior During Affect Production in Autism Spectrum Disorder.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2025Article
- Digital speech assessments and machine learning for differentiation of neurodegenerative diseases.Clinical parkinsonism & related disorders · 2025Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Communication Sciences and Disorders: Introduction to the Forum.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is a progressive neurodegenerative disease that severely impacts affected persons' speech and motor functions, yet early detection and tracking of disease progression remain challenging. The current gold standard for monitoring ALS progression, the ALS functional rating scale - revised (ALSFRS-R), is based on subjective ratings of symptom severity, and may not capture subtle but clinically meaningful changes due to a lack of granularity. Multimodal speech measures which can be automatically collected from patients in a remote fashion allow us to bridge this gap because they are continuous-valued and therefore, potentially more granular at capturing disease progression. Here we investigate the responsiveness and sensitivity of multimodal speech measures in persons with ALS (pALS) collected via a remote patient monitoring platform in an effort to quantify how long it takes to detect a clinically-meaningful change associated with disease progression. We recorded audio and video from 278 participants and automatically extracted multimodal speech biomarkers (acoustic, orofacial, linguistic) from the data. We find that the timing alignment of pALS speech relative to a canonical elicitation of the same prompt and the number of words used to describe a picture are the most responsive measures at detecting such change in both pALS with bulbar (n = 36) and non-bulbar onset (n = 107). Interestingly, the responsiveness of these measures is stable even at small sample sizes. We further found that certain speech measures are sensitive enough to track bulbar decline even when there is no patient-reported clinical change, i.e. the ALSFRS-R speech score remains unchanged at 3 out of a total possible score of 4. The findings of this study have the potential to facilitate improved, accelerated and cost-effective clinical trials and care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.