ArticleEarly human development2024
Circadian rhythm development in preterm infants. The role of postnatal versus postmenstrual age.
Article in Early human development, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- The developing relationship between circadian rhythm and heart rate variability in premature infants.Clinical autonomic research : official journal of the Clinical Autonomic Research Society · 2026Article
- Circadian clock activity in human umbilical vein endothelial cells of preterm and term neonates.Pediatric research · 2025Article
- Simulated kangaroo care in very preterm infants does not reduce physiological instability: the COSYBABY randomised controlled cross-over trial.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND,
aimsCircadian rhythm maturation may be disturbed in premature infants undergoing neonatal intensive care. We used continuous heart rate recordings across the entire neonatal intensive care period to study circadian rhythm development in preterm infants and to evaluate the roles of postmenstrual (PMA) versus postnatal age (PNA). MATERIALS AND
methodsThe circadian rhythm was calculated using a cosine fit of heart rate. The circadian rhythm amplitudes were averaged weekly and studied relative to PMA and PNA using the linear mixed effects models, adjusting for clinical variables that could affect the heart rate. The daily circadian rhythms were used to create grand averages for PMA groups: ≤31, 32-35, and > 35 weeks, and for PNA groups: ≤30, 31-60, and > 60 days.
resultsSixty-six infants were evaluated as part of an ongoing prospective study with gestational ages between 23 and 36 weeks. The PMA (1.47 × 10
conclusionsOur results indicate circadian rhythm matures with advancing gestation. The reversed circadian rhythm phase during the early postnatal period could be due to premature exposure to the ex-utero environment and warrant further study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.