Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39126626›Full record

ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2024

Epizootic Hemorrhagic Disease Virus Titration.

Kerry Newbrook

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Kerry NewbrookThe Pirbright Institute, Woking, Surrey, UK. kerry.newbrook@pirbright.ac.uk.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The titration of viruses onto susceptible cell lines is an important virological technique used to quantify infectious viral titers. It forms an integral component of epizootic hemorrhagic disease virus (EHDV) research, including estimating infectivity, calculating multiplicity of infection, and confirming virus propagation in cell culture. However, the ability to quantify infectious EHDV is also critical for disease control, particularly in the event of an outbreak. Routine EHD diagnostics do not accurately quantify infectious virus, which would allow accurate prediction of the onward transmission risk, but instead are typically more qualitative in nature (e.g., virus isolation) or only quantify viral genome copies (e.g., real-time PCR) which often remain detectable long after infectious virus is cleared from the host.Infectious EHDV titers are typically quantified through the detection of visible cytopathic effect (CPE) in the monolayer of susceptible mammalian cell cultures. However, not all susceptible cell lines demonstrate visible CPE upon EHDV infection, including cell lines such as KC cells, which are derived from the EHDV biological insect vector, Culicoides sonorensis. This chapter presents a comprehensive method for the titration of EHDV-positive samples onto relevant, susceptible mammalian (Vero) and insect (KC) cell lines and describes alternative methods that can be used to visualize EHDV infection, by CPE or immunofluorescent labeling of viral proteins, to enable the calculation of infectious EHDV titers.

Indexed as

Hemorrhagic Disease Virus, EpizooticAnimalsCell LineCytopathogenic Effect, ViralReoviridae InfectionsViral LoadVirus CultivationCell cultureCytopathic effectImmunofluorescenceMicroscopyTCID50Virus titration

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.