ArticleInternational journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery2024
Development of a human machine interface for robotically assisted surgery optimized for laparoscopic workflows.
Article in International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A bird's-eye view for future ionic thermoelectrics: from ions to products.National science review · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionIn robotic-assisted surgery (RAS), the input device is the primary site for the flow of information between the user and the robot. Most RAS systems remove the surgeon's console from the sterile surgical site. Beneficial for performing lengthy procedures with complex systems, this ultimately lacks the flexibility that comes with the surgeon being able to remain at the sterile site.
methodsA prototype of an input device for RAS is constructed. The focus lies on intuitive control for surgeons and a seamless integration into the surgical workflow within the sterile environment. The kinematic design is translated from the kinematics of laparoscopic surgery. The input device uses three degrees of freedom from a flexible instrument as input. The prototype's performance is compared to that of a commercially available device in an evaluation. Metrics are used to evaluate the surgeons' performance with the respective input device in a virtual environment implemented for the evaluation.
resultsThe evaluation of the two input devices shows statistically significant differences in the performance metrics. With the proposed prototype, the surgeons perform the tasks faster, more precisely, and with fewer errors.
conclusionThe prototype is an efficient and intuitive input device for surgeons with laparoscopic experience. The placement in the sterile working area allows for seamless integration into the surgical workflow and can potentially enable new robotic approaches.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.