Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39126561›Full record

ArticleMedical & biological engineering & computing2024

Leveraging feature selection for enhanced fall risk prediction in elderly using gait analysis.

Sabri Altunkaya

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical & biological engineering & computing, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Sabri AltunkayaDepartment of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, Necmettin Erbakan University, Konya, Türkiye. saltunkaya@erbakan.edu.tr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0853-0095

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is no effective fall risk screening tool for the elderly that can be integrated into clinical practice. Developing a system that can be easily used in primary care services is a current need. Current studies focus on the use of multiple sensors or activities to achieve higher accuracy. However, multiple sensors and activities reduce the availability of these systems. This study aims to develop a system to perform fall prediction for the elderly by using signals recorded from a single sensor during a short-term activity. A total of 168 features in the time and frequency domains were created using acceleration signals obtained from 71 elderly people. The features were weighted based on the ReliefF algorithm, and the artificial neural networks model was developed using the most important features. The best classification result was obtained using the 17 most important features of those weighted for K = 20 nearest neighbors. The highest accuracy was 82.2% (82.9% Sensitivity, 81.6% Specificity). The partially high accuracy obtained in our study shows that falling can be detected early with a sensor and a simple activity by determining the right features and can be easily applied in the assessment of the elderly during routine follow-ups.

Indexed as

Accidental FallsAlgorithmsGait AnalysisNeural Networks, ComputerAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleGaitHumansMaleRisk AssessmentAccelerometerFall predictionFall riskGait measures

Identifiers

PMID39126561
PMCPMC11568989

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.