ArticleOral radiology2025
Ultrasonography as an additional tool to localize impacted canines.
Article in Oral radiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Canine impaction is a common dental anomaly that requires a multidisciplinary approach, from diagnosis to treatment. The regular two-dimensional (2D) radiographs are able to visualize if the tooth is impacted, but unable to specifically localize it, and determine if there are any root resorptions associated to it. The cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) is able to three-dimensionally determine its location, aiding to the diagnosis and treatment plan. The major disadvantage is the amount of radiation that is added to the patient and can be even more significant in pediatric patients. The intra-oral ultrasound (io-US) is a new non-invasive and non-radiating real-time chairside imaging method that has the potential to aid in locating the impacted tooth. This paper presents 4 cases that required a CBCT for the location and treatment planning of impacted maxillary canines and were also scanned with intra-oral ultrasound. The images were then compared to the CBCT exam for validation of the new method. Through these cases, we highlight the capability of the io-US to locate the impacted canines. Other advantages of io-US might include evaluation of soft tissue thickness and vasculature that are important for surgical planning and execution.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39126535What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.