Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39126471›Full record

ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2024

Analysis of Meiotic Progression by Ex Vivo Culture of Mouse Embryonic Ovaries.

Odei Barreñada, Silvia González-Sanz, Alba López-Palacios, Jesús A Carballo, Jesús Del Mazo, Miguel A Brieño-Enríquez

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Odei BarreñadaMagee-Womens Research Institute, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology & Reproductive Sciences, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Silvia González-SanzDepartment of Cellular & Molecular Biology. Centro de Investigaciones Biológicas Margarita Salas (CIB-CSIC), Madrid, Spain.
Alba López-PalaciosDepartment of Cellular & Molecular Biology. Centro de Investigaciones Biológicas Margarita Salas (CIB-CSIC), Madrid, Spain.
Jesús A CarballoInstitute of Functional Biology and Genomics (IBFG, CSIC-USAL), Salamanca, Spain. j.carballo@csic.es.
Jesús Del MazoDepartment of Cellular & Molecular Biology. Centro de Investigaciones Biológicas Margarita Salas (CIB-CSIC), Madrid, Spain. jdelmazo@cib.csic.es.
Miguel A Brieño-EnríquezMagee-Womens Research Institute, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology & Reproductive Sciences, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA. brienoenriquezma@mwri.magee.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Oogenesis is the central process required to produce viable oocytes in female mammals. It is initiated during embryonic development, and it involves the specification of primordial germ cells (PGCs) and progresses through the activation of the meiotic program, reaching a crucial phase in prophase I before pausing at diplotene around the time of birth. The significance of meiosis, particularly the prophase I stage, cannot be overstated, as it plays a pivotal role in ensuring the formation of healthy gametes, a prerequisite for successful reproduction. While research has explored meiosis across various organisms, understanding how environmental factors, including radiation, drugs, endocrine disruptors, reproductive age, or diet, influence this complex developmental process remains incomplete. In this chapter, we describe an ex vivo culture method to investigate meiotic prophase I and beyond and the disruption of oogenesis by external factors. Using this methodology, it is possible to evaluate the effects of individual xenobiotics by administering chemicals at specific points during oogenesis. This culture technique was optimized to study the effects of two selected endocrine disruptors (vinclozolin and MEHP), demonstrating that vinclozolin exposure delayed meiotic differentiation and MEHP exposure reduced follicle size. This approach also opens avenues for future applications, involving the exploration of established or novel pharmaceutical substances and their influence on essential events during prophase I, such as homologous recombination and chromosome segregation. These processes collectively dictate the ultimate fitness of oocytes, with potential implications for factors relevant to the reproductive age and fertility.

Indexed as

MeiosisOvaryAnimalsEmbryo, MammalianEndocrine DisruptorsFemaleMeiotic Prophase IMiceOocytesOogenesisOxazolesEndocrine DisruptorsOxazolesvinclozolin3RsEx vivo culture 3DFolliculogenesisMeiosisMeiotic recombinationOocyte developmentReproductive agingReproductive toxicology

Identifiers

PMID39126471

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.