ArticleJournal of gastroenterology2024
The risk stratification and predictive performance of a new combined polygenic risk score for hepatocellular carcinoma.
Article in Journal of gastroenterology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Association Between Allostatic Load, Genetic Susceptibility, and Liver Cancer Incidence: A Large-Scale Prospective Cohort Study.International journal of cancer · 2026Article
- Genetics of MASLD: a diabetes perspective.Diabetologia · 2026Review
- Low Alanine Aminotransferase Levels in Alcohol Consuming Male Subjects, Carriers of the Common ALDH2 Deficient Variant, ALDH2*2.Hepatology research : the official journal of the Japan Society of Hepatology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundRecent genome-wide association studies (GWASs) in liver diseases have generated some polygenic risk scores (PRSs), but their predictive effectiveness on hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) risk assessment remains unclear.
methodsHere, we constructed a novel combined polygenic risk score and evaluated its increment to the well-established risk model. We used 15 HCC-associated genetic loci from two PRSs and FinnGen GWAS data to calculate a PRS-combined score and to fit the related PRS model in the UK Biobank cohort (N = 436,162). The PRS-combined score was further assessed for risk stratification for HCC integrating with the recommended clinical risk scores.
resultsThe PRS-combined model achieved a better AUC (0.657) than that of PRS-HFC (0.637) and PRS-cirrhosis (0.645). The top 20% of the PRS-combined distribution had a 3.25 increased risk of HCC vs. the middle decile (45-55%). At the population level, the addition of PRS-combined to the CLivD score significantly increased the C-statistic (from 0.716 to 0.746) and provided a remarkable improvement in reclassification (NRI = 0.088) at the 10-year risk threshold of 0.2%. In clinic, additional assessment of PRS-combined would reclassify 34,647 intermediate-risk participants as high genetic risk, corresponding to an increase of 63.92% (62/97) of the HCC events classified at high risk using the Fibrosis-4 alone.
conclusionsThe PRS may enhance HCC risk prediction effectiveness in the general population and refine risk stratification of the conventional clinical indicator.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39126459What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.