Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39126270›Full record

ArticleJournal of fish biology2024

One fish, two fish, three fish, more: novel resighting method produces precise and cost-effective estimates of abundance.

Joshua D Dennis, Lauren Meyer, Christine L Dudgeon, Charlie Huveneers

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of fish biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Joshua D DennisCollege of Science and Engineering, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7442-6667
Lauren MeyerCollege of Science and Engineering, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Christine L DudgeonThe University of the Sunshine Coast, Petrie, Queensland, Australia.
Charlie HuveneersCollege of Science and Engineering, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.

Funding

Holsworth Wildlife Research Endowment
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Estimates of abundance are essential to manage and conserve marine species. Numerous methods are available to determine population size, but the suitability of methods for schooling fishes and the associated precision can vary depending on the species and system. Here, we developed and compared three mark-recapture/resight methods to assess the most robust method to estimate the abundance of silver trevally (Pseudocaranx georgianus). While the recapture rate was similar across the methods, the swim pass method (resighting) recorded the largest number of individuals (mean ± standard error 211 ± 14.9) and had the lowest coefficient of variation (CV; 4.5%-12%) compared to 360-video (resighting, 45 ± 2.1 individuals surveyed, 14.8%-22.2% CV) and large-scale capture methods (recapture, 30 ± 3.8 individuals surveyed, 17.3%-26.5% CV). The inclusion of individual identification into the abundance estimator models for large-scale capture did not change the abundance estimates and showed similar resolution between the models (CV 18.2%-26.7%). We showed that the swim pass method is logistically easy to implement and generates precise estimates of silver trevally abundance. This new method provides a low-cost, time-efficient resighting method that can be adapted to suit similar aggregating pelagic species interacting with wildlife tourism operations, enabling researchers to rapidly estimate the abundance of species that have been previously difficult to count.

Indexed as

Population DensityAnimalsConservation of Natural ResourcesCost-Benefit AnalysisPerciformesmark‐recapturemark‐resightpelagic fishpopulation estimatePseudocaranxtrevally

Identifiers

PMID39126270
PMCPMC11650942

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.