Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39126204›Full record

ArticleDatabase : the journal of biological databases and curation2024

The biomedical relationship corpus of the BioRED track at the BioCreative VIII challenge and workshop.

Rezarta Islamaj, Chih-Hsuan Wei, Po-Ting Lai, Ling Luo, Cathleen Coss, Preeti Gokal Kochar, Nicholas Miliaras, Oleg Rodionov, Keiko Sekiya, Dorothy Trinh and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Database : the journal of biological databases and curation, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. The overview of the BioRED (Biomedical Relation Extraction Dataset) track at BioCreative VIII.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Rezarta IslamajNational Library of Medicine (NLM), National Institutes of Health (NIH), 8600 Rockville Pike, Bethesda, MD 20894, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-5651-1860
Chih-Hsuan WeiNational Library of Medicine (NLM), National Institutes of Health (NIH), 8600 Rockville Pike, Bethesda, MD 20894, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-5094-7321
Po-Ting LaiNational Library of Medicine (NLM), National Institutes of Health (NIH), 8600 Rockville Pike, Bethesda, MD 20894, United States.
Ling LuoSchool of Computer Science and Technology, Dalian University of Technology, No.2 Linggong Road, Ganjingzi District, Dalian, Liaoning 116024, China.ORCID 0000-0002-5141-0259
Cathleen CossNational Library of Medicine (NLM), National Institutes of Health (NIH), 8600 Rockville Pike, Bethesda, MD 20894, United States.
Preeti Gokal KocharNational Library of Medicine (NLM), National Institutes of Health (NIH), 8600 Rockville Pike, Bethesda, MD 20894, United States.
Nicholas MiliarasNational Library of Medicine (NLM), National Institutes of Health (NIH), 8600 Rockville Pike, Bethesda, MD 20894, United States.
Oleg RodionovNational Library of Medicine (NLM), National Institutes of Health (NIH), 8600 Rockville Pike, Bethesda, MD 20894, United States.
Keiko SekiyaNational Library of Medicine (NLM), National Institutes of Health (NIH), 8600 Rockville Pike, Bethesda, MD 20894, United States.
Dorothy TrinhNational Library of Medicine (NLM), National Institutes of Health (NIH), 8600 Rockville Pike, Bethesda, MD 20894, United States.
Deborah WhitmanNational Library of Medicine (NLM), National Institutes of Health (NIH), 8600 Rockville Pike, Bethesda, MD 20894, United States.
Zhiyong LuNational Library of Medicine (NLM), National Institutes of Health (NIH), 8600 Rockville Pike, Bethesda, MD 20894, United States.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 62302076the NIH Intramural Research Program, National Library of Medicine
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The automatic recognition of biomedical relationships is an important step in the semantic understanding of the information contained in the unstructured text of the published literature. The BioRED track at BioCreative VIII aimed to foster the development of such methods by providing the participants the BioRED-BC8 corpus, a collection of 1000 PubMed documents manually curated for diseases, gene/proteins, chemicals, cell lines, gene variants, and species, as well as pairwise relationships between them which are disease-gene, chemical-gene, disease-variant, gene-gene, chemical-disease, chemical-chemical, chemical-variant, and variant-variant. Furthermore, relationships are categorized into the following semantic categories: positive correlation, negative correlation, binding, conversion, drug interaction, comparison, cotreatment, and association. Unlike most of the previous publicly available corpora, all relationships are expressed at the document level as opposed to the sentence level, and as such, the entities are normalized to the corresponding concept identifiers of the standardized vocabularies, namely, diseases and chemicals are normalized to MeSH, genes (and proteins) to National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) Gene, species to NCBI Taxonomy, cell lines to Cellosaurus, and gene/protein variants to Single Nucleotide Polymorphism Database. Finally, each annotated relationship is categorized as 'novel' depending on whether it is a novel finding or experimental verification in the publication it is expressed in. This distinction helps differentiate novel findings from other relationships in the same text that provides known facts and/or background knowledge. The BioRED-BC8 corpus uses the previous BioRED corpus of 600 PubMed articles as the training dataset and includes a set of newly published 400 articles to serve as the test data for the challenge. All test articles were manually annotated for the BioCreative VIII challenge by expert biocurators at the National Library of Medicine, using the original annotation guidelines, where each article is doubly annotated in a three-round annotation process until full agreement is reached between all curators. This manuscript details the characteristics of the BioRED-BC8 corpus as a critical resource for biomedical named entity recognition and relation extraction. Using this new resource, we have demonstrated advancements in biomedical text-mining algorithm development. Database URL: https://codalab.lisn.upsaclay.fr/competitions/16381.

Indexed as

Data CurationData MiningHumansPubMedSemantics

Identifiers

PMID39126204
PMCPMC11315767

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.