Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39125919›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2024

A Review of Probe-Based Enrichment Methods to Inform Plant Virus Diagnostics.

Thomas Farrall, Jeremy Brawner, Adrian Dinsdale, Monica Kehoe

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Thomas FarrallPlant Innovation Centre, Australian Government, Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry (DAFF), Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia.
Jeremy BrawnerForest Research Institute, School of Science, Technology and Engineering, University of the Sunshine Coast, Sippy Downs, QLD 4556, Australia.
Adrian DinsdalePlant Innovation Centre, Australian Government, Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry (DAFF), Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia.
Monica KehoeDiagnostic Laboratory Services, Biosecurity and Sustainability, Department of Primary Industries and Regional Development (DPIRD), Perth, WA 6151, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-6210-4364

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Modern diagnostic techniques based on DNA sequence similarity are currently the gold standard for the detection of existing and emerging pathogens. Whilst individual assays are inexpensive to use, assay development is costly and carries risks of not being sensitive or specific enough to capture an increasingly diverse range of targets. Sequencing can provide the entire nucleic acid content of a sample and may be used to identify all pathogens present in the sample when the depth of coverage is sufficient. Targeted enrichment techniques have been used to increase sequence coverage and improve the sensitivity of detection within virus samples, specifically, to capture sequences for a range of different viruses or increase the number of reads from low-titre virus infections. Vertebrate viruses have been well characterised using in-solution hybridisation capture to target diverse virus families. The use of probes for genotyping and strain identification has been limited in plants, and uncertainty around sensitivity is an impediment to the development of a large-scale virus panel to use within regulatory settings and diagnostic pipelines. This review aims to compare significant studies that have used targeted enrichment of viruses to identify approaches to probe design and potential for use in plant virus detection and characterisation.

Indexed as

Plant DiseasesPlant VirusesMolecular Diagnostic TechniquesPlantshybridisation capturenext-generation sequencingviruses

Identifiers

PMID39125919
PMCPMC11312432

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.