Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39125814›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2024

Large-Scale Screening of Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substance Binding Interactions and Their Mixtures with Nuclear Receptors.

Saptarshi Roy, James Moran, Keerthana Danasekaran, Kate O'Brien, Sivanesan Dakshanamurthy

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. The Impact of Forever Chemicals on Protein Structure and Function.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) toxicity and mitigation of adipogenic dysregulation in 3T3-L1 preadipocytes.Food and chemical toxicology : an international journal published for the British Industrial Biological Research Association · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Saptarshi RoyCollege of Humanities and Sciences, Virginia Commonwealth University, 907 Floyd Ave, Richmond, VA 23284, USA.
James MoranCollege of Arts & Sciences, Georgetown University, 3700 O St NW, Washington, DC 20057, USA.
Keerthana DanasekaranCollege of Arts and Sciences, University of Rochester, 500 Joseph C. Wilson Blvd, Rochester, NY 14627, USA.
Kate O'BrienDavidson College, 405 N Main St, Davidson, NC 28035, USA.
Sivanesan DakshanamurthyLombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University, 3700 O St NW, Washington, DC 20057, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3681-4121

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite their significant impact, comprehensive screenings and detailed analyses of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substance (PFAS) binding strengths at the orthosteric and allosteric sites of NRs are currently lacking. This study addresses this gap by focusing on the binding interaction analysis of both common and uncommon PFAS with the nuclear receptors (NRs) vitamin D receptor (VDR), peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPARγ), pregnane X receptor (PXR), and estrogen receptor alpha (ERα). Advanced docking simulations were used to screen 9507 PFAS chemicals at the orthosteric and allosteric sites of PPARγ, PXR, VDR, and ERα. All receptors exhibited strong binding interactions at the orthosteric and allosteric site with a significant number of PFAS. We verified the accuracy of the docking protocol through multiple docking controls and validations. A mixture modeling analysis indicates that PFAS can bind in various combinations with themselves and endogenous ligands simultaneously, to disrupt the endocrine system and cause carcinogenic responses. These findings reveal that PFAS can interfere with nuclear receptor activity by displacing endogenous or native ligands by binding to the orthosteric and allosteric sites. The purpose of this study is to explore the mechanisms through which PFAS exert their endocrine-disrupting effects, potentially leading to more targeted therapeutic strategies. Importantly, this study is the first to explore the binding of PFAS at allosteric sites and to model PFAS mixtures at nuclear receptors. Given the high concentration and persistence of PFAS in humans, this study further emphasizes the urgent need for further research into the carcinogenic mechanisms of PFAS and the development of therapeutic strategies that target nuclear receptors.

Indexed as

FluorocarbonsMolecular Docking SimulationProtein BindingReceptors, Cytoplasmic and NuclearAllosteric SiteBinding SitesEndocrine DisruptorsHumansLigandsPregnane X ReceptorReceptors, CalcitriolEndocrine DisruptorsFluorocarbonsLigandsPregnane X ReceptorReceptors, CalcitriolReceptors, Cytoplasmic and Nuclearallosteric sitemolecular dockingnuclear receptororthosteric sitePFASPFAS screening

Identifiers

PMID39125814
PMCPMC11312074

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.