Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39125647›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2024

Targeting the Tumor Vascular Supply to Enhance Radiation Therapy Administered in Single or Clinically Relevant Fractionated Schedules.

Michael R Horsman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Michael R HorsmanExperimental Clinical Oncology-Department of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, DK-8200 Aarhus, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0003-1578-5691

Funding

Danish Cancer Society R40-A2022-11-S2Danish Council for Independent Research: Medical Sciences DFF - 4004-00362
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This pre-clinical study was designed to demonstrate how vascular disrupting agents (VDAs) should be administered, either alone or when combined with radiation in clinically relevant fractionated radiation schedules, for the optimal anti-tumor effect. CDF1 mice, implanted in the right rear foot with a 200 mm

Indexed as

Dose Fractionation, RadiationAnimalsCell Line, TumorFemaleMammary Neoplasms, ExperimentalMiceMice, Inbred C3HNeovascularization, PathologicStilbenesfosbretabulinStilbenesC3H mammary carcinomaCA1P/OXi4503combretastatin A-1 phosphatelocal tumor controlradiationtumor growth delayvascular disrupting agents

Identifiers

PMID39125647
PMCPMC11311563

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.