Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39125553›Full record

ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Evaluation of Machine Learning Classification Models for False-Positive Reduction in Prostate Cancer Detection Using MRI Data.

Malte Rippa, Ruben Schulze, Georgia Kenyon, Marian Himstedt, Maciej Kwiatkowski, Rainer Grobholz, Stephen Wyler, Alexander Cornelius, Sebastian Schindera, Felice Burn

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. AI in Medical Imaging and Image Processing.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Malte RippaInstitute for Medical Informatics, University of Lübeck, 23562 Lübeck, Germany.
Ruben SchulzeFuse-AI GmbH, 20457 Hamburg, Germany.
Georgia KenyonAustralian Institute of Machine Learning, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-8894-9920
Marian HimstedtInstitute for Medical Informatics, University of Lübeck, 23562 Lübeck, Germany.
Maciej KwiatkowskiDepartment of Urology, Cantonal Hospital Aarau, 5001 Aarau, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-8853-4554
Rainer GrobholzInstitute of Pathology, Cantonal Hospital Aarau, 5001 Aarau, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-1901-7967
Stephen WylerDepartment of Urology, Cantonal Hospital Aarau, 5001 Aarau, Switzerland.
Alexander CorneliusInstitute of Radiology, Cantonal Hospital Aarau, 5001 Aarau, Switzerland.
Sebastian SchinderaMedical Faculty, University Hospital Basel, 4056 Basel, Switzerland.
Felice BurnInstitute of Radiology, Cantonal Hospital Aarau, 5001 Aarau, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-4362-162X

Funding

Research Council Cantonal Hospital Aarau, Switzerland FR1410.000.156
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this work, several machine learning (ML) algorithms, both classical ML and modern deep learning, were investigated for their ability to improve the performance of a pipeline for the segmentation and classification of prostate lesions using MRI data. The algorithms were used to perform a binary classification of benign and malignant tissue visible in MRI sequences. The model choices include support vector machines (SVMs), random decision forests (RDFs), and multi-layer perceptrons (MLPs), along with radiomic features that are reduced by applying PCA or mRMR feature selection. Modern CNN-based architectures, such as ConvNeXt, ConvNet, and ResNet, were also evaluated in various setups, including transfer learning. To optimize the performance, different approaches were compared and applied to whole images, as well as gland, peripheral zone (PZ), and lesion segmentations. The contribution of this study is an investigation of several ML approaches regarding their performance in prostate cancer (PCa) diagnosis algorithms. This work delivers insights into the applicability of different approaches for this context based on an exhaustive examination. The outcome is a recommendation or preference for which machine learning model or family of models is best suited to optimize an existing pipeline when the model is applied as an upstream filter.

Indexed as

deep learningmachine learningmedical imagingmultiparametric MRIprostate cancer

Identifiers

PMID39125553
PMCPMC11311676

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.