Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39125544›Full record

ReviewDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Exploring Publicly Accessible Optical Coherence Tomography Datasets: A Comprehensive Overview.

Anastasiia Rozhyna, Gábor Márk Somfai, Manfredo Atzori, Delia Cabrera DeBuc, Amr Saad, Jay Zoellin, Henning Müller

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Initiation of a global consortium to study the progression of age-related macular degeneration: RIMR AMD consortium report # 1.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. The march to harmonized imaging standards for retinal imaging.Progress in retinal and eye research · 2025
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Anastasiia RozhynaInformatics Institute, University of Applied Sciences Western Switzerland (HES-SO), 3960 Sierre, Switzerland.ORCID 0009-0000-6912-2565
Gábor Márk SomfaiDepartment of Ophthalmology, Stadtspital Zürich, 8063 Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-6329-442X
Manfredo AtzoriInformatics Institute, University of Applied Sciences Western Switzerland (HES-SO), 3960 Sierre, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-5397-2063
Delia Cabrera DeBucBascom Palmer Eye Institute, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, FL 33136, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4726-894X
Amr SaadDepartment of Ophthalmology, Stadtspital Zürich, 8063 Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-0574-6739
Jay ZoellinDepartment of Ophthalmology, Stadtspital Zürich, 8063 Zurich, Switzerland.
Henning MüllerInformatics Institute, University of Applied Sciences Western Switzerland (HES-SO), 3960 Sierre, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-6800-9878

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Artificial intelligence has transformed medical diagnostic capabilities, particularly through medical image analysis. AI algorithms perform well in detecting abnormalities with a strong performance, enabling computer-aided diagnosis by analyzing the extensive amounts of patient data. The data serve as a foundation upon which algorithms learn and make predictions. Thus, the importance of data cannot be underestimated, and clinically corresponding datasets are required. Many researchers face a lack of medical data due to limited access, privacy concerns, or the absence of available annotations. One of the most widely used diagnostic tools in ophthalmology is Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT). Addressing the data availability issue is crucial for enhancing AI applications in the field of OCT diagnostics. This review aims to provide a comprehensive analysis of all publicly accessible retinal OCT datasets. Our main objective is to compile a list of OCT datasets and their properties, which can serve as an accessible reference, facilitating data curation for medical image analysis tasks. For this review, we searched through the Zenodo repository, Mendeley Data repository, MEDLINE database, and Google Dataset search engine. We systematically evaluated all the identified datasets and found 23 open-access datasets containing OCT images, which significantly vary in terms of size, scope, and ground-truth labels. Our findings indicate the need for improvement in data-sharing practices and standardized documentation. Enhancing the availability and quality of OCT datasets will support the development of AI algorithms and ultimately improve diagnostic capabilities in ophthalmology. By providing a comprehensive list of accessible OCT datasets, this review aims to facilitate better utilization and development of AI in medical image analysis.

Indexed as

datadata analysisdatasetsdata sharingOCTopen dataoptical coherence tomography

Identifiers

PMID39125544
PMCPMC11312046

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.