Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39125501›Full record

ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2024

An Analytical Study on the Utility of RGB and Multispectral Imagery with Band Selection for Automated Tumor Grading.

Suchithra Kunhoth, Somaya Al-Maadeed

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Suchithra KunhothDepartment of Computer Science and Enginering, Qatar University, Doha 2713, Qatar.ORCID 0000-0002-0583-2573
Somaya Al-MaadeedDepartment of Computer Science and Enginering, Qatar University, Doha 2713, Qatar.ORCID 0000-0002-0241-2899

Funding

Qatar National Research Fund ARG01-0513-230141
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The implementation of tumor grading tasks with image processing and machine learning techniques has progressed immensely over the past several years. Multispectral imaging enabled us to capture the sample as a set of image bands corresponding to different wavelengths in the visible and infrared spectrums. The higher dimensional image data can be well exploited to deliver a range of discriminative features to support the tumor grading application. This paper compares the classification accuracy of RGB and multispectral images, using a case study on colorectal tumor grading with the QU-Al Ahli Dataset (dataset I). Rotation-invariant local phase quantization (LPQ) features with an SVM classifier resulted in 80% accuracy for the RGB images compared to 86% accuracy with the multispectral images in dataset I. However, the higher dimensionality elevates the processing time. We propose a band-selection strategy using mutual information between image bands. This process eliminates redundant bands and increases classification accuracy. The results show that our band-selection method provides better results than normal RGB and multispectral methods. The band-selection algorithm was also tested on another colorectal tumor dataset, the Texas University Dataset (dataset II), to further validate the results. The proposed method demonstrates an accuracy of more than 94% with 10 bands, compared to using the whole set of 16 multispectral bands. Our research emphasizes the advantages of multispectral imaging over the RGB imaging approach and proposes a band-selection method to address the higher computational demands of multispectral imaging.

Indexed as

colorectal cancerhistopathologyinfrared imagemultispectralRGB image

Identifiers

PMID39125501
PMCPMC11312293

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.