ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2024
Compact Linear Flow Phantom Model for Retinal Blood-Flow Evaluation.
Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Biphasic Change in Retinal Arterial Hemodynamics Amidst Systematic Perfusion Decline With Increasing Degree of Myopia.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Impaired retinal blood flow is associated with ocular diseases such as glaucoma, macular degeneration, and diabetic retinopathy. Among several ocular imaging techniques developed to measure retinal blood flow both invasively and non-invasively, adaptive optics (AO)-enabled scanning laser ophthalmoscopy (AO-SLO) resolves individual red blood cells and provides a high resolution with which to measure flow across retinal microvasculature. However, cross-validation of flow measures remains a challenge owing to instrument and patient-specific variability in each imaging technique. Hence, there is a critical need for a well-controlled clinical flow phantom for standardization and to establish blood-flow measures as clinical biomarkers for early diagnosis. Here, we present the design and validation of a simple, compact, portable, linear flow phantom based on a direct current motor and a conveyor-belt system that provides linear velocity tuning within the retinal microvasculature range (0.5-7 mm/s). The model was evaluated using a sensitive AO-SLO line-scan technique, which showed a <6% standard deviation from the true velocity. Further, a clinical SLO instrument showed a linear correlation with the phantom's true velocity (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.