Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39125475›Full record

ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Combined Use of Phenotypic Screening and of a Novel Commercial Assay (REALQUALITY Carba-Screen) for the Rapid Molecular Detection of Carbapenemases: A Single-Center Experience.

Federica Novazzi, Gabriele Arcari, Francesca Drago Ferrante, Sara Boutahar, Angelo Paolo Genoni, Davide Carcione, Gianluca Cassani, Paolo Gigante, Mattia Carbotti, Riccardo Capuano and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Federica NovazziLaboratory of Medical Microbiology and Virology, University Hospital of Varese, 21100 Varese, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-2741-8840
Gabriele ArcariLaboratory of Medical Microbiology and Virology, University Hospital of Varese, 21100 Varese, Italy.
Francesca Drago FerranteLaboratory of Medical Microbiology and Virology, University Hospital of Varese, 21100 Varese, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-4950-0703
Sara BoutaharLaboratory of Medical Microbiology and Virology, University Hospital of Varese, 21100 Varese, Italy.
Angelo Paolo GenoniLaboratory of Medical Microbiology and Virology, University Hospital of Varese, 21100 Varese, Italy.
Davide CarcioneLaboratory of Clinical Microbiology and Virology, ASST Valle Olona, 21013 Gallarate, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-4411-0407
Gianluca CassaniLaboratory of Medical Microbiology and Virology, University Hospital of Varese, 21100 Varese, Italy.
Paolo GiganteLaboratory of Medical Microbiology and Virology, University Hospital of Varese, 21100 Varese, Italy.
Mattia CarbottiLaboratory of Medical Microbiology and Virology, University Hospital of Varese, 21100 Varese, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-8484-3205
Riccardo CapuanoLaboratory of Medical Microbiology and Virology, University Hospital of Varese, 21100 Varese, Italy.
Renée PasciutaLaboratory of Medical Microbiology and Virology, University Hospital of Varese, 21100 Varese, Italy.
Nicasio ManciniLaboratory of Medical Microbiology and Virology, University Hospital of Varese, 21100 Varese, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-0637-0910

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Carbapenem resistance is a serious public health threat, causing numerous deaths annually primarily due to healthcare-associated infections. To face this menace, surveillance programs in high-risk patients are becoming a widespread practice. Here we report the performance of the combined use of a recently approved commercial multiplex real-time PCR assay (REALQUALITY Carba-Screen kit) with conventional phenotypic screening. In this three-month study, 479 rectal swabs from 309 patients across high-risk units were evaluated by combining the two approaches. Although the molecular assay showed a higher positivity rate than phenotypic screening (7.1% vs. 5%), it should be noted that the molecular method alone would have missed eight carbapenem-resistant isolates, while using only phenotypic screening would not have detected sixteen isolates. This demonstrates the complementary strengths of each method. Our study confirms the need for a combined approach to maximize the possible clinical impact of this kind of screening, ensuring a more comprehensive detection of resistant strains.

Indexed as

antimicrobial resistancecarbapenemasesmolecular detectionphenotypic screeningsurveillance programs

Identifiers

PMID39125475
PMCPMC11311838

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.