ArticleNutrients2024
Relationship between Improvement in Physical Activity and Three Nutritional Assessment Indicators in Patients Admitted to a Convalescent Rehabilitation Ward.
Article in Nutrients, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Leveraging Digital Health Technologies to Assess Older Adults' Frailty and Nutritional Status: Two Cross-Sectional Studies.JMIR aging · 2026Observational
- Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We investigated the relationship between three nutritional indicators, the Mini Nutritional Assessment-Short Form (MNA-SF), Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index (GNRI), and Controlling Nutrition Status (CONUT), and physical activity at discharge in patients admitted to convalescent rehabilitation wards. The study included 1601 patients (77 ± 12 years, male 46.2%) discharged from convalescent rehabilitation wards between April 2018 and September 2023. MNA-SF, GNRI, and CONUT scores were obtained on admission. Patients were divided into two groups according to their level of Functional Independence Measure (FIM) walk score at discharge. The walking group (n = 1181, FIM walk score ≥ 5, 76 ± 13 years, male 47.2%) was significantly younger than the wheelchair group (n = 420, 79 ± 12 years, FIM walk score < 5, male 43.8%) and had significantly higher MNA-SF (6.5 ± 2.5 vs. 4.7 ± 2.4) and GNRI (93.1 ± 12.4 vs. 86.7 ± 10.9) scores and significantly lower CONUT (3.1 ± 2.3 vs. 3.9 ± 2.3) scores than the wheelchair group (all
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.