Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39125405›Full record

ReviewNutrients2024

Cosmeceuticals: A Review of Clinical Studies Claiming to Contain Specific, Well-Characterized Strains of Probiotics or Postbiotics.

Ioannis M Theodorou, Dorothea Kapoukranidou, Markos Theodorou, Joulia K Tsetis, Alexandra Eleftheria Menni, Georgios Tzikos, Stella Bareka, Anne Shrewsbury, George Stavrou, Katerina Kotzampassi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nutrients, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Development of Pharmabiotic Gel-Serums withGels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  4. Multi-Kingdom Synergy ofLife (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Ioannis M TheodorouHellenic Institute for the Study of Sepsis (HISS), 11528 Athens, Greece.ORCID 0009-0006-3526-194X
Dorothea KapoukranidouDepartment of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 54636 Thessaloniki, Greece.
Markos TheodorouUni-Pharma S.A., 14564 Athens, Greece.
Joulia K TsetisUni-Pharma S.A., 14564 Athens, Greece.
Alexandra Eleftheria MenniDepartment of Surgery, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 54636 Thessaloniki, Greece.
Georgios TzikosDepartment of Surgery, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 54636 Thessaloniki, Greece.
Stella BarekaDepartment of Surgery, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 54636 Thessaloniki, Greece.
Anne ShrewsburyDepartment of Surgery, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 54636 Thessaloniki, Greece.
George StavrouDepartment of Surgery, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge CB2 2QQ, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5948-8037
Katerina KotzampassiHellenic Institute for the Study of Sepsis (HISS), 11528 Athens, Greece.ORCID 0000-0003-0241-7216

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The skin serves as a critical barrier against external threats-dehydration, ultraviolet exposure, and infections-playing a significant role in internal homeostasis and moisture retention. Additionally, and equally importantly, it interacts dynamically with the complex microbiome resident in it, which is essential for maintaining skin health. Recent interest has focused on the use of probiotics and postbiotics, besides their ability to modulate the skin microbiome, to enhance barrier function, and exhibit anti-inflammatory properties, to be involved in skincare, by having the potential to improve skin hydration, elasticity, and overall appearance, as well as in reducing signs of aging, such as wrinkles and fine lines. The products-being a combination of a cosmetic regime plus probiotic[s] or postbiotic[s]-are named cosmeceuticals. However, to comply with the regulations for the characterization of a microorganism as a specific probiotic strain, the pro- or postbiotics incorporated into the cosmetic regime should be both genetically and phenotypically defined. Thus, in this review, we present 14 published clinical trials using such cosmetic products with specific, well-characterized strains of probiotics or postbiotics applied to volunteers with healthy skin. Looking at the results of these studies collectively, we can say that these genetically and phenotypically defined strains of either live or inanimate bacteria and/or their components seem to keep the treated skin at least fully hydrated, with intact epithelial tone, increased radiance, and with decreased wrinkle depth, while normalizing the commensal skin microbiota. Future advancements in personalized skin care may lead to genomic sequencing and metabolomics to tailor probiotic and postbiotic treatments to individual skin microbiomes, promising a new frontier in cosmeceuticals.

Indexed as

CosmeceuticalsProbioticsSkinSkin AgingClinical Trials as TopicHumansMicrobiotaCosmeceuticalscosmeceuticalsdermocosmeticspostbioticsprobioticsskin healthtopical use

Identifiers

PMID39125405
PMCPMC11314542

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.