ArticlePolymers2024
Stress Wave Propagation and Decay Based on Micro-Scale Modelling in the Topology of Polymer Composite with Circular Particles.
Article in Polymers, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Thermal shock resistance of various two-dimensional materials: a comparative analysis.RSC advances · 2026Article
- Composite Structure as a Stress Wave Barrier Zone Under Impulse Loading: Microscale Numerical Analysis of Attenuation.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Polymer Analysis and Characterization.Polymers · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This article deals with stress wave decay performance, analysing the stress wave propagation generated by an impulsive unit load in a 2D representative unit cell (RUC) of a polymer composite with circular particles representing spherical particles, elliptical particles, and short fibres. The micro-scale numerical simulation uses explicit finite element analysis (FEA). The micro-response to an impulsive unit load creates a stress wave amplitude interacting with the material structure and tends to weaken and absorb energy. The stress wave damping is determined by the decaying amplitudes of Mises stress at the front of the stress wave. The stress wave damping is evaluated for different ratios of tensile modules and material densities of matrix and reinforcing material and other factors, such as percentage and particle size, applied to nine topologies of RUCs, and even the presence of an interfacial region is analysed. Moreover, the article visualises the phases of stress wave decay in various particle distributions, i.e., various topologies. Analysing the different topologies of the same particle volume (area) percentage, the study proved that the composite topology and resulting wave-particle and wave-wave interactions are other sources of material damping. The presence of even a small percentage, 3.5 area%, of reinforcing circular particles in the matrix brings a significant increase in stress wave damping up to about 40-43% (depending on the topology) compared to a homogeneous matrix with stress wave damping of 12.5% under the same conditions. Moreover, the topology with the same volume (area) percentage can increase particle stress wave damping by 15.3%.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.