ArticlePolymers2024
Material Compatibility in 4D Printing: Identifying the Optimal Combination for Programmable Multi-Material Structures.
Article in Polymers, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Optimizing Interfacial Adhesion and Mechanical Performance of Multimaterial Joints Fabricated by Material Extrusion.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Biomimetic Additive Manufacturing: Engineering Complexity Inspired by Nature's Simplicity.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- From Stents to Smart Implants Employing Biomimetic Materials: The Impact of 4D Printing on Modern Healthcare.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study identifies the optimal combination of active and passive thermoplastic materials for producing multi-material programmable 3D structures. These structures can undergo shape changes with varying radii of curvature over time when exposed to hot water. The research focuses on examining the thermal, thermomechanical, and mechanical properties of active (PLA) and passive (PRO-PLA, ABS, and TPU) materials. It also includes the experimental determination of the radius of curvature of the programmed 3D structures. The pairing of active PLA with passive PRO-PLA was found to be the most effective for creating complex programmable 3D structures capable of two-sided transformation. This efficacy is attributed to the adequate apparent shear strength, significant differences in thermomechanical shrinkage between the two materials, identical printing parameters for both materials, and the lowest bending storage modulus of PRO-PLA among the passive materials within the activation temperature range. Multi-material 3D printing has also proven to be a suitable method for producing programmable 3D structures for practical applications such as phone stands, phone cases, door hangers, etc. It facilitates the programming of the active material and ensures the dimensional stability of the passive components of programmable 3D structures during thermal activation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.