Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
2 · The registry
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
5 · Who and what money
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Adrianna ĆwiertniaDepartment of Reconstructive Surgery and Gynecological Oncology, University Clinical Hospital No. 2, Pomeranian Medical University in Szczecin, Al. Powstańców Wielkopolskich 72, 70-111 Szczecin, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-6963-9329
Dominika BorzyszkowskaDepartment of Reconstructive Surgery and Gynecological Oncology, University Clinical Hospital No. 2, Pomeranian Medical University in Szczecin, Al. Powstańców Wielkopolskich 72, 70-111 Szczecin, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-6259-5052
Anna GolaraDepartment of Reconstructive Surgery and Gynecological Oncology, University Clinical Hospital No. 2, Pomeranian Medical University in Szczecin, Al. Powstańców Wielkopolskich 72, 70-111 Szczecin, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-4300-4557
Natalia TuczyńskaDepartment of Reconstructive Surgery and Gynecological Oncology, University Clinical Hospital No. 2, Pomeranian Medical University in Szczecin, Al. Powstańców Wielkopolskich 72, 70-111 Szczecin, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-1815-5388
Mateusz KozłowskiDepartment of Reconstructive Surgery and Gynecological Oncology, University Clinical Hospital No. 2, Pomeranian Medical University in Szczecin, Al. Powstańców Wielkopolskich 72, 70-111 Szczecin, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-1176-2153
Wojciech PoncyljuszDepartment of Diagnostic Imaging and Interventional Radiology, University Clinical Hospital No. 1, Pomeranian Medical University in Szczecin, 71-252 Szczecin, Poland.
Agnieszka Sompolska-RzechułaDepartment of Applied Mathematics in Economics, Faculty of Economics, West Pomerania University of Technology Szczecin, Janickiego 31, 71-270 Szczecin, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-7571-1152
Katarzyna KotrychInstitute of X-ray Diagnostic and CT, USG and MRI Scanning Workroom, University Clinical Hospital No. 2, Pomeranian Medical University in Szczecin, 70-204 Szczecin, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-1391-4499
Aneta Cymbaluk-PłoskaDepartment of Reconstructive Surgery and Gynecological Oncology, University Clinical Hospital No. 2, Pomeranian Medical University in Szczecin, Al. Powstańców Wielkopolskich 72, 70-111 Szczecin, Poland.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
6 · The paper itself
Abstract
Ovarian cancer is one of the most common causes of cancer death in women worldwide. Most often, it is detected in an advanced stage due to its insidious onset and lack of symptoms in stages I and II. That is why imaging diagnostics is so important. Therefore, we assessed the consistency of the image seen on CT with the actual image assessed during surgery.
Indexed as
computed tomographycytoreductiondebulking surgerygynecologic oncologyoncologyovarian cancer
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.
Ovarian Cancer Staging-How CT Scan Descriptions Differ from Surgical Findings. · full record | OpenQuestion