ReviewMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2024
Anisotropy of Additively Manufactured Metallic Materials.
Review in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Functional Materials for Additive Manufacturing: Materials Design, Processing, and Emerging Applications.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Temperature-Dependent Deformation Mechanisms in Ti65 Alloy: An In Situ Tensile Study.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Additive manufacturing (AM) is a technology that builds parts layer by layer. Over the past decade, metal additive manufacturing (AM) technology has developed rapidly to form a complete industry chain. AM metal parts are employed in a multitude of industries, including biomedical, aerospace, automotive, marine, and offshore. The design of components can be improved to a greater extent than is possible with existing manufacturing processes, which can result in a significant enhancement of performance. Studies on the anisotropy of additively manufactured metallic materials have been reported, and they describe the advantages and disadvantages of preparing different metallic materials using additive manufacturing processes; however, there are few in-depth and comprehensive studies that summarize the microstructural and mechanical properties of different types of additively manufactured metallic materials in the same article. This paper begins by outlining the intricate relationship between the additive manufacturing process, microstructure, and metal properties. It then explains the fundamental principles of powder bed fusion (PBF) and directed energy deposition (DED). It goes on to describe the molten pool and heat-affected zone in the additive manufacturing process and analyzes their effects on the microstructure of the formed parts. Subsequently, the mechanical properties and typical microstructures of additively manufactured titanium alloys, stainless steel, magnesium-aluminum alloys, and high-temperature alloys, along with their anisotropy, are summarized and presented. The summary indicates that the factors leading to the anisotropy of the mechanical properties of metallic AM parts are either their unique microstructural features or manufacturing defects. This anisotropy can be improved by post-heat treatment. Finally, the most recent research on the subject of metal AM anisotropy is presented.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.