Article in Plants (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
2 · The registry
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
5 · Who and what money
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Britte M HeijinkDepartment of Ecosystem and Landscape Dynamics, Institute for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Dynamics, University of Amsterdam, 1012 WP Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Annabel ZwartsDepartment of Ecosystem and Landscape Dynamics, Institute for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Dynamics, University of Amsterdam, 1012 WP Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Nina H WitteveenDepartment of Ecosystem and Landscape Dynamics, Institute for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Dynamics, University of Amsterdam, 1012 WP Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-0214-4238
Jessica WatsonInstitute for Global Change, Florida Institute of Technology, Melbourne, FL 32901, USA.
Arie EbbenhorstDepartment of Ecosystem and Landscape Dynamics, Institute for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Dynamics, University of Amsterdam, 1012 WP Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0009-0009-7395-4327
Fedde VeenmanDepartment of Ecosystem and Landscape Dynamics, Institute for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Dynamics, University of Amsterdam, 1012 WP Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Mats KesselDepartment of Ecosystem and Landscape Dynamics, Institute for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Dynamics, University of Amsterdam, 1012 WP Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Susana León-YánezEscuela de Ciencias Biológicas, Pontificia Universidad Católica del Ecuador, Quito 170143, Ecuador.ORCID 0000-0002-8733-135X
Juan Ernesto Guevara-AndinoGrupo de Investigación en Ecología y Evolución en los Trópicos-EETrop, Universidad de las Américas, Quito 170124, Ecuador.
María-José EndaraGrupo de Investigación en Ecología y Evolución en los Trópicos-EETrop, Universidad de las Américas, Quito 170124, Ecuador.ORCID 0000-0002-8805-1456
Gonzalo Rivas-TorresEstación de Biodiversidad Tiputini, Colegio de Ciencias Biológicas y Ambientales, Universidad San Francisco de Quito (USFQ), Quito 170901, Ecuador.ORCID 0000-0002-2704-8288
Mark B BushInstitute for Global Change, Florida Institute of Technology, Melbourne, FL 32901, USA.
Crystal N H McMichaelDepartment of Ecosystem and Landscape Dynamics, Institute for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Dynamics, University of Amsterdam, 1012 WP Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-1064-1499
Funding
European Research Council StG 853394National Science Foundation NSFEAR-1303831Netherlands Organisation for Applied Scientific Research ALWOP.322
6 · The paper itself
Abstract
The Ecuadorian Amazon holds more biodiversity than most other places on Earth. Palms are a particularly dominant component of the vegetation; however, it remains unknown to what degree the pattern has persisted through time. Here, we investigate the persistence of palm dominance through time and the degree to which past human activities (e.g., fire, cultivation, and forest opening) have affected changes in palm abundances across five regions of the Ecuadorian Amazon. We analyzed soil cores (40-80 cm depth) from each region for charcoal (evidence of past fire) and phytoliths (evidence of past vegetation change). The timings of fires (based on
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.
Past Fire and Vegetation Change in the Hyperdiverse Forests of the Ecuadorian Amazon. · full record | OpenQuestion