Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39124088›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Intensity-Product-Based Optical Sensing to Beat the Diffraction Limit in an Interferometer.

Byoung S Ham

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Closing the Loop: High-Precision 3D Photofabrication in Living Tissues.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Byoung S HamSchool of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Gwangju Institute of Science and Technology, Gwangju 61005, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-3609-8508

Funding

GIST research project granted by GIST in 2024Ministry of Science and ICT IITP 2024-2021-0-01810
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The classically defined minimum uncertainty of the optical phase is known as the standard quantum limit or shot-noise limit (SNL), originating in the uncertainty principle of quantum mechanics. Based on the SNL, the phase sensitivity is inversely proportional to K, where K is the number of interfering photons or statistically measured events. Thus, using a high-power laser is advantageous to enhance sensitivity due to the K gain in the signal-to-noise ratio. In a typical interferometer, however, the resolution remains in the diffraction limit of the K = 1 case unless the interfering photons are resolved as in quantum sensing. Here, a projection measurement method in quantum sensing is adapted for classical sensing to achieve an additional K gain in the resolution. To understand the projection measurements, several types of conventional interferometers based on N-wave interference are coherently analyzed as a classical reference and numerically compared with the proposed method. As a result, the Kth-order intensity product applied to the N-wave spectrometer exceeds the diffraction limit in classical sensing and the Heisenberg limit in quantum sensing, where the classical N-slit system inherently satisfies the Heisenberg limit of π/N in resolution.

Indexed as

higher-order intensity productmany-wave interferenceoptical sensingprojection measurement

Identifiers

PMID39124088
PMCPMC11315043

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.