Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39124030›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Simplification of Mobility Tests and Data Processing to Increase Applicability of Wearable Sensors as Diagnostic Tools for Parkinson's Disease.

Rana M Khalil, Lisa M Shulman, Ann L Gruber-Baldini, Sunita Shakya, Rebecca Fenderson, Maxwell Van Hoven, Jeffrey M Hausdorff, Rainer von Coelln, Michael P Cummings

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Rana M KhalilCenter for Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0327-013X
Lisa M ShulmanDepartment of Neurology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1652-1201
Ann L Gruber-BaldiniDepartment of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0190-1973
Sunita ShakyaDepartment of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8046-2456
Rebecca FendersonDepartment of Neurology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA.
Maxwell Van HovenDepartment of Neurology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA.
Jeffrey M HausdorffCenter for the Study of Movement, Cognition, and Mobility, Neurological Institute, Tel Aviv Medical Center, Tel Aviv 6492416, Israel.ORCID 0000-0002-1608-0776
Rainer von CoellnDepartment of Neurology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7651-2780
Michael P CummingsCenter for Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1467-0334

Funding

University of Maryland Claude D. Pepper Older Americans Independence Center (UM-OAIC)P30AG028747 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE · PI ALICE S. RYAN · 2006 to 2026
$28.9M
NIA NIH HHS P30 AG028747University of Maryland MPower Seed Grant Award, the Rosalyn Newman Foundation, and the University of Maryland Claude D. Pepper Older Americans Independence Center P30-AG028747
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Quantitative mobility analysis using wearable sensors, while promising as a diagnostic tool for Parkinson's disease (PD), is not commonly applied in clinical settings. Major obstacles include uncertainty regarding the best protocol for instrumented mobility testing and subsequent data processing, as well as the added workload and complexity of this multi-step process. To simplify sensor-based mobility testing in diagnosing PD, we analyzed data from 262 PD participants and 50 controls performing several motor tasks wearing a sensor on their lower back containing a triaxial accelerometer and a triaxial gyroscope. Using ensembles of heterogeneous machine learning models incorporating a range of classifiers trained on a set of sensor features, we show that our models effectively differentiate between participants with PD and controls, both for mixed-stage PD (92.6% accuracy) and a group selected for mild PD only (89.4% accuracy). Omitting algorithmic segmentation of complex mobility tasks decreased the diagnostic accuracy of our models, as did the inclusion of kinesiological features. Feature importance analysis revealed that Timed Up and Go (TUG) tasks to contribute the highest-yield predictive features, with only minor decreases in accuracy for models based on cognitive TUG as a single mobility task. Our machine learning approach facilitates major simplification of instrumented mobility testing without compromising predictive performance.

Indexed as

AccelerometryMachine LearningParkinson DiseaseWearable Electronic DevicesAgedAlgorithmsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle Ageddiagnosismachine learningmobility testingmovement analysismovement disordersParkinson’s diseasewearable sensors

Identifiers

PMID39124030
PMCPMC11314738

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.