ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2024
Controlled Porosity of Selective Laser Melting-Produced Thermal Pipes: Experimental Analysis and Machine Learning Approach for Pore Recognition on Pipes Surfaces.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study investigates the methods for controlling porosity in thermal pipes manufactured using selective laser melting (SLM) technology. Experiments conducted include water permeability tests and surface roughness measurements, which are complemented by SEM image ML-based analysis for pore recognition. The results elucidate the impact of SLM printing parameters on water permeability. Specifically, an increase in hatch and point distances leads to a linear rise in permeability, while higher laser power diminishes permeability. Using machine learning (ML) techniques, precise pore identification on SEM images depicting surface microstructures of the samples is achieved. The average percentage of the surface area containing detected pores for microstructure samples printed with laser parameters (laser power (W) _ hatch distance (µm) _ point distance (µm)) 175_ 80_80 was found to be 5.2%, while for 225_120_120, it was 4.2%, and for 275_160_160, it was 3.8%. Pore recognition was conducted using the Haar feature-based method, and the optimal patch size was determined to be 36 pixels on monochrome images of microstructures with a magnification of 33×, which were acquired using a Leica S9 D microscope.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.