Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39123963›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Eye Tracking Post Processing to Detect Visual Artifacts and Quantify Visual Attention under Cognitive Task Activity during fMRI.

Maxime Leharanger, Pan Liu, Luc Vandromme, Olivier Balédent

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Maxime LeharangerCHIMERE UR 7516, Jules Verne University of Picardy, 80000 Amiens, France.ORCID 0009-0004-5342-6352
Pan LiuCHIMERE UR 7516, Jules Verne University of Picardy, 80000 Amiens, France.ORCID 0000-0003-0559-6432
Luc VandrommeCHIMERE UR 7516, Jules Verne University of Picardy, 80000 Amiens, France.
Olivier BalédentCHIMERE UR 7516, Jules Verne University of Picardy, 80000 Amiens, France.ORCID 0000-0001-6028-6440

Funding

Association Nationale de la Recherche et de la Technologie 2020/073EquipEX Figures 10-EQPX-0001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Determining visual attention during cognitive tasks using activation MRI remains challenging. This study aimed to develop a new eye-tracking (ET) post-processing platform to enhance data accuracy, validate the feasibility of subsequent ET-fMRI applications, and provide tool support. Sixteen volunteers aged 18 to 20 were exposed to a visual temporal paradigm with changing images of objects and faces in various locations while their eye movements were recorded using an MRI-compatible ET system. The results indicate that the accuracy of the data significantly improved after post-processing. Participants generally maintained their visual attention on the screen, with mean gaze positions ranging from 89.1% to 99.9%. In cognitive tasks, the gaze positions showed adherence to instructions, with means ranging from 46.2% to 50%. Temporal consistency assessments indicated prolonged visual tasks can lead to decreased attention during certain tasks. The proposed methodology effectively identified and quantified visual artifacts and losses, providing a precise measure of visual attention. This study offers a robust framework for future work integrating filtered eye-tracking data with fMRI analyses, supporting cognitive neuroscience research.

Indexed as

ArtifactsAttentionCognitionEye MovementsEye-Tracking TechnologyMagnetic Resonance ImagingAdolescentAdultFemaleHumansMaleYoung Adultbehavioral feedbackcognitive taskseye-trackingsignal processingvisual stimuli

Identifiers

PMID39123963
PMCPMC11314996

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.