Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39123912›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Spectral Features Analysis for Print Quality Prediction in Additive Manufacturing: An Acoustics-Based Approach.

Michael Olowe, Michael Ogunsanya, Brian Best, Yousef Hanif, Saurabh Bajaj, Varalakshmi Vakkalagadda, Olukayode Fatoki, Salil Desai

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Nanomaterials for Energy Storage Systems-A Review.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Michael OloweDepartment of Industrial and Systems Engineering, North Carolina Agricultural and Technical State University, Greensboro, NC 27411, USA.
Michael OgunsanyaDepartment of Industrial and Systems Engineering, North Carolina Agricultural and Technical State University, Greensboro, NC 27411, USA.
Brian BestInformation Technology (IT) and Smart Manufacturing & Artificial Intelligence (SMAI), Micron Technology Virginia, 9600 Godwin Dr., Manassas, VA 20110, USA.
Yousef HanifInformation Technology (IT) and Smart Manufacturing & Artificial Intelligence (SMAI), Micron Technology Virginia, 9600 Godwin Dr., Manassas, VA 20110, USA.
Saurabh BajajInformation Technology (IT) and Smart Manufacturing & Artificial Intelligence (SMAI), Micron Technology Virginia, 9600 Godwin Dr., Manassas, VA 20110, USA.
Varalakshmi VakkalagaddaInformation Technology (IT) and Smart Manufacturing & Artificial Intelligence (SMAI), Micron Technology Virginia, 9600 Godwin Dr., Manassas, VA 20110, USA.
Olukayode FatokiDepartment of Industrial and Systems Engineering, North Carolina Agricultural and Technical State University, Greensboro, NC 27411, USA.ORCID 0009-0001-9890-0845
Salil DesaiDepartment of Industrial and Systems Engineering, North Carolina Agricultural and Technical State University, Greensboro, NC 27411, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6116-2105

Funding

National Science Foundation 2100739National Science Foundation 2100850United States Department of Defense NCDMCSP
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Quality prediction in additive manufacturing (AM) processes is crucial, particularly in high-risk manufacturing sectors like aerospace, biomedicals, and automotive. Acoustic sensors have emerged as valuable tools for detecting variations in print patterns by analyzing signatures and extracting distinctive features. This study focuses on the collection, preprocessing, and analysis of acoustic data streams from a Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM) 3D-printed sample cube (10 mm × 10 mm × 5 mm). Time and frequency-domain features were extracted at 10-s intervals at varying layer thicknesses. The audio samples were preprocessed using the Harmonic-Percussive Source Separation (HPSS) method, and the analysis of time and frequency features was performed using the Librosa module. Feature importance analysis was conducted, and machine learning (ML) prediction was implemented using eight different classifier algorithms (K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), Support Vector Machine (SVM), Gaussian Naive Bayes (GNB), Decision Trees (DT), Logistic Regression (LR), Random Forest (RF), Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGB), and Light Gradient Boosting Machine (LightGBM)) for the classification of print quality based on the labeled datasets. Three-dimensional-printed samples with varying layer thicknesses, representing two print quality levels, were used to generate audio samples. The extracted spectral features from these audio samples served as input variables for the supervised ML algorithms to predict print quality. The investigation revealed that the mean of the spectral flatness, spectral centroid, power spectral density, and RMS energy were the most critical acoustic features. Prediction metrics, including accuracy scores, F-1 scores, recall, precision, and ROC/AUC, were utilized to evaluate the models. The extreme gradient boosting algorithm stood out as the top model, attaining a prediction accuracy of 91.3%, precision of 88.8%, recall of 92.9%, F-1 score of 90.8%, and AUC of 96.3%. This research lays the foundation for acoustic based quality prediction and control of 3D printed parts using Fused Deposition Modeling and can be extended to other additive manufacturing techniques.

Indexed as

3D printingacoustic data acquisitionArtificial Intelligencedigital signal processinglibrosaquality predictionspectral feature analysis

Identifiers

PMID39123912
PMCPMC11314769

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.