Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39123853›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Reconstruction of Optical Properties in Turbid Media: Omitting the Need of the Collimated Transmission for an Integrating Sphere Setup.

Dongqin Ni, Niklas Karmann, Martin Hohmann

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Dongqin NiInstitute of Photonic Technologies (LPT), Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Konrad-Zuse-Straße 3/5, 91052 Erlangen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-2533-8932
Niklas KarmannInstitute of Photonic Technologies (LPT), Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Konrad-Zuse-Straße 3/5, 91052 Erlangen, Germany.
Martin HohmannInstitute of Photonic Technologies (LPT), Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Konrad-Zuse-Straße 3/5, 91052 Erlangen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-5099-1015

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft 503621669
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Currently, the most reliable approach to reconstruct optical properties, namely absorption coefficient, reduced scattering coefficient, scattering coefficient and asymmetry factor, of turbid media is through inverse Monte Carlo simulation. To determine these optical properties, three measurements are required: total transmission, total reflection and collimated transmission. However, the accurate determination of the collimated transmission is very difficult. To overcome the difficulty of measuring the collimated transmission, it is proposed to measure the total transmission and total reflection of the same sample with two different thicknesses instead. To prove this alternative solution, machine learning is used to prove that the repeated measurement for two different thicknesses carries all the necessary information. As a result, all four optical properties can be measured with high accuracy, particularly for interpolation problems where the test data fall within the range of the training data. For extrapolation problems, high accuracy can be achieved in the determination of at least the absorption coefficient, reduced scattering coefficient and scattering coefficient. Hence, these results allow that in the future, an easier and therefore more precise reconstruction of the optical properties is possible, potentially even with inverse Monte Carlo simulations as the current standard.

Indexed as

machine learningoptical propertiesspectroscopy

Identifiers

PMID39123853
PMCPMC11314773

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.