ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2024
Design Decisions for Wearable EEG to Detect Motor Imagery Movements.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The objective of this study was to make informed decisions regarding the design of wearable electroencephalography (wearable EEG) for the detection of motor imagery movements based on testing the critical features for the development of wearable EEG. Three datasets were utilized to determine the optimal acquisition frequency. The brain zones implicated in motor imagery movement were analyzed, with the aim of improving wearable-EEG comfort and portability. Two detection algorithms with different configurations were implemented. The detection output was classified using a tool with various classifiers. The results were categorized into three groups to discern differences between general hand movements and no movement; specific movements and no movement; and specific movements and other specific movements (between five different finger movements and no movement). Testing was conducted on the sampling frequencies, trials, number of electrodes, algorithms, and their parameters. The preferred algorithm was determined to be the FastICACorr algorithm with 20 components. The optimal sampling frequency is 1 kHz to avoid adding excessive noise and to ensure efficient handling. Twenty trials are deemed sufficient for training, and the number of electrodes will range from one to three, depending on the wearable EEG's ability to handle the algorithm parameters with good performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.