Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39123748›Full record

ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2024

The Royal Zoological Society of Scotland's Approach to Assessing and Promoting Animal Welfare in Collaboration with Universities.

Kristine M Gandia, Jo Elliott, Simon Girling, Sharon E Kessler, Hannah M Buchanan-Smith

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Kristine M GandiaPsychology, Faculty of Natural Sciences, University of Stirling, Stirling FK9 4LA, UK.ORCID 0009-0005-7792-138X
Jo ElliottRoyal Zoological Society of Scotland, 134 Corstorphine Road, Edinburgh EH12 6TS, UK.
Simon GirlingRoyal Zoological Society of Scotland, 134 Corstorphine Road, Edinburgh EH12 6TS, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9927-9491
Sharon E KesslerPsychology, Faculty of Natural Sciences, University of Stirling, Stirling FK9 4LA, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4969-1810
Hannah M Buchanan-SmithPsychology, Faculty of Natural Sciences, University of Stirling, Stirling FK9 4LA, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2516-7734

Funding

Royal Zoological Society of Scotland Registered charity number: SC004064University of St Andrews Registered charity number: SC013532
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Good zoos have four aims-to conserve species, educate the public, engage in research, and provide recreation-all of which can only be achieved when underpinned by high animal welfare standards. In this paper, we share the approach that The Royal Zoological Society of Scotland's (RZSS) Edinburgh Zoo and Highland Wildlife Park take to animal welfare. We highlight the role that animal welfare research, in collaboration with universities, has had in enabling the zoo to take an evidence-based approach to welfare and to put findings into practice. We share the collaborative process through which we developed and piloted the current animal welfare assessment tools, how they were validated, and how they were tested for reliability as part of a long-term collaboration between the Royal Zoological Society of Scotland and the University of Stirling: (1) the RZSS Welfare Assessment Tool, a 50-question animal welfare assessment adapted from the British and Irish Association of Zoos and Aquariums (BIAZA) Toolkit; and (2) the Stirling Toolkit, a package of evidence-based resources for behavioural-data collection. Our aim is to facilitate standardised, evidence-based approaches to assessing animal welfare which, when finalised, can be used collaboratively across zoos.

Indexed as

animal welfareanimal welfare assessmentfive domainspositive welfarezoo

Identifiers

PMID39123748
PMCPMC11311029

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.