ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2024
Automatic Quality Assessment of Pork Belly via Deep Learning and Ultrasound Imaging.
Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- AI-Driven Nondestructive Measurement Technologies for Meat Quality and Safety: A Review.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- MPG-SwinUMamba: High-Precision Segmentation and Automated Measurement of Eye Muscle Area in Live Sheep Based on Deep Learning.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025Article
- Recent Advances in Spectroscopy and Imaging Techniques for Nondestructive Detection of Meat Quality and Safety.Food science & nutrition · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Pork belly, prized for its unique flavor and texture, is often overlooked in breeding programs that prioritize lean meat production. The quality of pork belly is determined by the number and distribution of muscle and fat layers. This study aimed to assess the number of pork belly layers using deep learning techniques. Initially, semantic segmentation was considered, but the intersection over union (IoU) scores for the segmented parts were below 70%, which is insufficient for practical application. Consequently, the focus shifted to image classification methods. Based on the number of fat and muscle layers, a dataset was categorized into three groups: three layers (n = 1811), five layers (n = 1294), and seven layers (n = 879). Drawing upon established model architectures, the initial model was refined for the task of learning and predicting layer traits from B-ultrasound images of pork belly. After a thorough evaluation of various performance metrics, the ResNet18 model emerged as the most effective, achieving a remarkable training set accuracy of 99.99% and a validation set accuracy of 96.22%, with corresponding loss values of 0.1478 and 0.1976. The robustness of the model was confirmed through three interpretable analysis methods, including grad-CAM, ensuring its reliability. Furthermore, the model was successfully deployed in a local setting to process B-ultrasound video frames in real time, consistently identifying the pork belly layer count with a confidence level exceeding 70%. By employing a scoring system with 100 points as the threshold, the number of pork belly layers in vivo was categorized into superior and inferior grades. This innovative system offers immediate decision-making support for breeding determinations and presents a highly efficient and precise method for assessment of pork belly layers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.