Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39123647›Full record

ArticleFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Sensory Analysis Performed within Augmented Virtuality System: Impact on Hedonic Scores, Engagement, and Presence Level.

José Carlos Ribeiro, Célia Rocha, Bruna Barbosa, Rui Costa Lima, Luís Miguel Cunha

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

José Carlos RibeiroGreenUPorto/INOV4Agro & DGAOT, Faculty of Sciences of the University of Porto, Rua da Agrária, 747, 4485-646 Vairão, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0003-2106-7979
Célia RochaGreenUPorto/INOV4Agro & DGAOT, Faculty of Sciences of the University of Porto, Rua da Agrária, 747, 4485-646 Vairão, Portugal.
Bruna BarbosaGreenUPorto/INOV4Agro & DGAOT, Faculty of Sciences of the University of Porto, Rua da Agrária, 747, 4485-646 Vairão, Portugal.
Rui Costa LimaSense Test, Lda, Rua Zeferino Costa, 341, 4400-345 Vila Nova de Gaia, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-4783-4489
Luís Miguel CunhaGreenUPorto/INOV4Agro & DGAOT, Faculty of Sciences of the University of Porto, Rua da Agrária, 747, 4485-646 Vairão, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-4590-7533

Funding

COMPETE2020, Portugal2020, Lisboa2020 and FEDER-European Regional Development Funds project MOBFOOD-Mobilizing scientific and technological knowledge in response to the chal-lenges of the agro-food marketFundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia Doctoral Grant No. 2023.03467.BDANAFundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia strategic projects UIDB/05748/2020 (https://doi.org/10.54499/UIDB/05748/2020) and UIDP/05748/2020 (https://doi.org/10.54499/UIDP/05748/2020)VIIAFOOD" Agenda, approved in the PRR programme (Notice No. 02/C05-i01/2022) No. C644929456-00000040, for the RTD project "HIT-C - High Integration Technology for Consumer Insights
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sensory analysis methodologies are performed in sensory booths designed to minimise external stimuli, lacking ecological validity. Immersive environments are used to introduce contextual cues, but there is a lack of studies using mixed reality systems. The main goal of this study was to evaluate an augmented virtuality (AV) system where participants are inserted into a virtual environment and evaluate a real product, being able to interact with both dimensions. A panel of 102 consumers evaluated five samples of commercial peach nectars in three sessions, each in a different environment: public food court, living room (AV environments), and laboratory (traditional sensory booth). Consumers rated overall liking, followed by open comments, and also answered an Engagement (EQ) and a Presence Questionnaire (PQ). The type of environment only affected hedonic discrimination among samples, with the laboratory setting being the only one with sample discrimination. Nonetheless, each sample was not evaluated differently across the different environments. Concerning engagement, the environment only significantly influenced the EQ's 'Affective Value' factor, being higher when using an AV system. The level of presence in the virtual environment was significantly higher in the public food court, being significantly correlated with the EQ factor scores.

Indexed as

consumercontexthedonic discriminationimmersive environmentmixed realityvirtual reality

Identifiers

PMID39123647
PMCPMC11311452

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.