Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39123639›Full record

ReviewFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Antimicrobial Resistance in Aquaculture: Risk Mitigation within the One Health Context.

Milan Milijasevic, Slavica Veskovic-Moracanin, Jelena Babic Milijasevic, Jelena Petrovic, Ivan Nastasijevic

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 52 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
52citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

52 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. In Vitro Screening of Butcher's Broom (Veterinary sciences · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Bacteriophages AgainstViruses · 2026
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Occurrence of Presumptive Methicillin-ResistantFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  15. Vitamin DApplied microbiology and biotechnology · 2026
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Milan MilijasevicInstitute of Meat Hygiene and Technology, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia.
Slavica Veskovic-MoracaninInstitute of Meat Hygiene and Technology, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia.
Jelena Babic MilijasevicInstitute of Meat Hygiene and Technology, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia.ORCID 0009-0003-8923-7046
Jelena PetrovicScientific Veterinary Institute 'Novi Sad', 21113 Novi Sad, Serbia.ORCID 0000-0001-5556-8558
Ivan NastasijevicInstitute of Meat Hygiene and Technology, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia.ORCID 0000-0002-7141-269X

Funding

Ministry of Science, Technological Development and Innovations, Serbia 451-03-66/2024-03/200050
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The application of antimicrobials in aquaculture primarily aims to prevent and treat bacterial infections in fish, but their inappropriate use may result in the emergence of zoonotic antibiotic-resistant bacteria and the subsequent transmission of resistant strains to humans via food consumption. The aquatic environment serves as a potential reservoir for resistant bacteria, providing an ideal breeding ground for development of antimicrobial resistance (AMR). The mutual inter-connection of intensive fish-farming systems with terrestrial environments, the food processing industry and human population creates pathways for the transmission of resistant bacteria, exacerbating the problem further. The aim of this study was to provide an overview of the most effective and available risk mitigation strategies to tackle AMR in aquaculture, based on the One Health (OH) concept. The stringent antimicrobial use guidelines, promoting disease control methods like enhanced farm biosecurity measures and vaccinations, alternatives to antibiotics (ABs) (prebiotics, probiotics, immunostimulants, essential oils (EOs), peptides and phage therapy), feeding practices, genetics, monitoring water quality, and improving wastewater treatment, rather than applying excessive use of antimicrobials, can effectively prevent the development of AMR and release of resistant bacteria into the environment and food. The contribution of the environment to AMR development traditionally receives less attention, and, therefore, environmental aspects should be included more prominently in OH efforts to predict, detect and prevent the risks to health. This is of particular importance for low and middle-income countries with a lack of integration of the national AMR action plans (NAPs) with the aquaculture-producing environment. Integrated control of AMR in fisheries based on the OH approach can contribute to substantial decrease in resistance, and such is the case in Asia, where in aquaculture, the percentage of antimicrobial compounds with resistance exceeding 50% (P50) decreased from 52% to 22% within the period of the previous two decades.

Indexed as

antimicrobial resistanceaquaculturefisheriesOne Healthrisk mitigation

Identifiers

PMID39123639
PMCPMC11311770

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.