ArticleFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2024
Understanding the Factors Driving Consumers' Willingness to Pay for Gene-Edited Foods in China.
Article in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Trust and doubt coexist: an empirical study on the acceptance mechanism of transgenic technology among Chinese youth.GM crops & food · 2026Article
- scientific, social, ecological rationality and public attitudes toward genetically modified food in China: based on the survey of urban residents in three cities of China.GM crops & food · 2026Article
- From lab to market: industrialization barriers and regulation optimization for new breeding technologies in China.GM crops & food · 2026Article
- Analysis of public perception and socio-demographic drivers of genetically modified organisms in Iran.GM crops & food · 2026Article
- Understanding Consumer Acceptance of Genetically Modified Foods: A Theory of Planned Behavior-Brand Equity-Sociodemographic Interactions.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Effects of CRISPR technology on agricultural sustainability: global applications and turkish perspective.Transgenic research · 2026Review
- Genome editing between wonder and rejection.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Article
- Building Technological Legitimacy: The Impact of Communication Strategies on Public Acceptance of Genetically Modified Foods in China.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Importance-Performance Map Analysis of the Drivers for the Acceptance of Genetically Modified Food with a Theory of Planned Behavior Groundwork.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- The decision to purchase genome edited food products by Iranian consumers: theory of planned behavior as a social intervention tool.Frontiers in genome editing · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Gene editing contributes to enhancing food security through the creation of novel foods. However, public perception of gene-edited (GE) foods is crucial to their acceptance and adoption. This study expanded the knowledge-attitude-practice model and constructed an integrated framework comprising four dimensions: demographic factors, scientific literacy and beliefs, social trust, and perceptions of gene technology, aimed at explaining the public's attitudes toward GE foods. A questionnaire survey was conducted (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.