Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39123525›Full record

ArticleFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Optimization of the Microwave-Assisted Extraction of Caffeine from Roasted Coffee Beans.

Ivan M Savić, Ivana M Savić Gajić, Dragoljub G Gajić

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ivan M SavićFaculty of Technology in Leskovac, University of Nis, Bulevar Oslobodjenja 124, 16000 Leskovac, Serbia.ORCID 0000-0002-9638-5413
Ivana M Savić GajićFaculty of Technology in Leskovac, University of Nis, Bulevar Oslobodjenja 124, 16000 Leskovac, Serbia.ORCID 0000-0001-5019-3806
Dragoljub G GajićSchool of Electrical Engineering, University of Belgrade, Bulevar Kralja Aleksandra 73, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia.

Funding

Ministry of Science, Technological Development and Innovation of the Republic of Serbia 451-03-65/2024-03/ 200133
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aimed to develop a fast procedure for caffeine extraction from roasted coffee beans. The microwave-assisted extraction was carried out in the microwave oven with an operating frequency of 2450 MHz. The response surface methodology based on a Box-Behnken design was used to model and optimize the extraction process. Among the analyzed extraction parameters (factors), the influence of extraction time (2-6 min), liquid-to-solid ratio (5-15 mL/g), and microwave power (336-595 W) were considered, while the yield of extracted caffeine was observed as the response of the system. Water was used as the solvent of choice for the extraction of caffeine. The optimum conditions were as follows: extraction time, 2 min; liquid-to-solid ratio, 15 mL/g; and microwave power, 500 W. In this optimized condition, the expected extraction yield of caffeine was 1.01 g/100 g dry weight (value confirmed by experimental assays). The total energy consumed of 1.7 kWh/100 g of purified caffeine indicated a more energy-efficient procedure by about 1200-15,000 times than the reported procedures. This study showed that caffeine can be quantitatively extracted from roasted coffee beans through a green approach and that the isolated caffeine has a high purity degree, which was confirmed by the UHPLC-ESI-MS/MS method. With this quality, isolated caffeine could be further used as an active ingredient in the food industry, while for pharmaceutical purposes, it must be further purified.

Indexed as

Box–Behnken designcaffeinecoffee beansmicrowave-assisted extractionoptimizationUHPLC-ESI-MS/MS analysis

Identifiers

PMID39123525
PMCPMC11312167

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.