ArticleCancers2024
Real-World Survival Impact of New Treatment Strategies for Lung Cancer: A 2000-2020 French Cohort.
Article in Cancers, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Adherence to a diet with higher protein quality significantly reduces the risk of lung cancer: results from a population-based prospective study.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Global disparities in access to diagnostics and therapies for advanced non-small cell lung cancer: from discovery to delivery - a review.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- Individualized approach to palliative care integration for patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Review
- High prevalence of targetable drivers but poor outcomes in lung adenocarcinoma: a real-world cohort from the French West Indies.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Editorial for Special Issue "Recent Advances in Trachea, Bronchus and Lung Cancer Management".Cancers · 2025Article
- Lipid-Based Nanoformulations of [6]-Gingerol for the Chemoprevention of Benzo[a] Pyrene-Induced Lung Carcinogenesis: Preclinical Evidence.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Association of systemic therapy with survival among adults with advanced non-small cell lung cancer.Translational lung cancer research · 2025Article
- Precision Oncology in Older Cancer Patients: A Single-Center Experience.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Over the past 20 years, several innovative therapies have been implemented in the treatment of lung cancer that have had reported survival benefits in clinical trials. Whether these improvements translate into the clinic setting has not been studied yet. We retrospectively analyzed all patients consecutively treated at Institute Curie for metastatic lung cancer. Diagnosis date was used to define three periods, based on the approvals of novel treatment strategies in the first-line setting, including targeted therapies in 2010 and immunotherapy in 2018. Endpoints included Overall survival (OS), survival rate of 2 years and 5 years, and a conditional survival rate of 2 years (if still alive at 6 months from treatment initiation). A total of 673 patients were identified for Period 1-2000 to 2009, 752 for Period 2-2010 to 2017, and 768 for Period 3-2018 to 2020. Median OS in the whole cohort was 11.1, 15.5, and 16.2 months, respectively. Median OS for patients with NSCLC or SCLC was 11.2, 17.2, and 18.2 months, or 10.9, 11.7, and 11.2 months, respectively. The two-year conditional survival was more favorable for NSCLC than SCLC patients. Outcomes were statistically higher for women as compared to men in all periods and all subgroups. Survival of patients with metastatic lung cancer has improved over the past 20 years, mostly in NSCLC, along with the implementation of novel treatment strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.