Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39123488›Full record

ReviewCancers2024

The Performance and Clinical Applicability of HER2 Digital Image Analysis in Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review.

Gauhar Dunenova, Zhanna Kalmataeva, Dilyara Kaidarova, Nurlan Dauletbaev, Yuliya Semenova, Madina Mansurova, Andrej Grjibovski, Fatima Kassymbekova, Aidos Sarsembayev, Daniil Semenov and 1 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancers, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Gauhar DunenovaDepartment of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Evidence-Based Medicine, Al-Farabi Kazakh National University, Almaty 050040, Kazakhstan.ORCID 0000-0002-6233-4984
Zhanna KalmataevaRector Office, Asfendiyarov Kazakh National Medical University, Almaty 050000, Kazakhstan.
Dilyara KaidarovaKazakh Research Institute of Oncology and Radiology, Almaty 050022, Kazakhstan.
Nurlan DauletbaevDepartment of Internal, Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Philipps University of Marburg, 35037 Marburg, Germany.
Yuliya SemenovaSchool of Medicine, Nazarbayev University, Astana 010000, Kazakhstan.ORCID 0000-0003-1324-7806
Madina MansurovaDepartment of Artificial Intelligence and Big Data, Al-Farabi Kazakh National University, Almaty 050040, Kazakhstan.
Andrej GrjibovskiCentral Scientific Research Laboratory, Northern State Medical University, Arkhangelsk 163000, Russia.
Fatima KassymbekovaDepartment of Public Health and Social Sciences, Kazakhstan Medical University "KSPH", Almaty 050060, Kazakhstan.ORCID 0000-0001-6440-5590
Aidos SarsembayevSchool of Digital Technologies, Almaty Management University, Almaty 050060, Kazakhstan.
Daniil SemenovComputer Science and Engineering Program, Astana IT University, Astana 020000, Kazakhstan.ORCID 0000-0003-2475-0976
Natalya GlushkovaDepartment of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Evidence-Based Medicine, Al-Farabi Kazakh National University, Almaty 050040, Kazakhstan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This systematic review aims to address the research gap in the performance of computational algorithms for the digital image analysis of HER2 images in clinical settings. While numerous studies have explored various aspects of these algorithms, there is a lack of comprehensive evaluation regarding their effectiveness in real-world clinical applications. We conducted a search of the Web of Science and PubMed databases for studies published from 31 December 2013 to 30 June 2024, focusing on performance effectiveness and components such as dataset size, diversity and source, ground truth, annotation, and validation methods. The study was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42024525404). Key questions guiding this review include the following: How effective are current computational algorithms at detecting HER2 status in digital images? What are the common validation methods and dataset characteristics used in these studies? Is there standardization of algorithm evaluations of clinical applications that can improve the clinical utility and reliability of computational tools for HER2 detection in digital image analysis? We identified 6833 publications, with 25 meeting the inclusion criteria. The accuracy rate with clinical datasets varied from 84.19% to 97.9%. The highest accuracy was achieved on the publicly available Warwick dataset at 98.8% in synthesized datasets. Only 12% of studies used separate datasets for external validation; 64% of studies used a combination of accuracy, precision, recall, and F1 as a set of performance measures. Despite the high accuracy rates reported in these studies, there is a notable absence of direct evidence supporting their clinical application. To facilitate the integration of these technologies into clinical practice, there is an urgent need to address real-world challenges and overreliance on internal validation. Standardizing study designs on real clinical datasets can enhance the reliability and clinical applicability of computational algorithms in improving the detection of HER2 cancer.

Indexed as

applicability in real clinical practicebreast cancerdigital image analysisHER2performance evaluation

Identifiers

PMID39123488
PMCPMC11311684

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.