Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39123474›Full record

ArticleCancers2024

Five-Year Relative Survival Rates of Women Diagnosed with Uterine Cancer by County-Level Socioeconomic Status Overall and across Histology and Race/Ethnicity.

Akemi T Wijayabahu, Jennifer K McGee-Avila, Meredith S Shiels, Alfonsus Adrian H Harsono, Rebecca C Arend, Megan A Clarke

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. A Comparison of Neighborhood Socioeconomic Deprivation Measures and the Association with Survival among Black and White Women with Endometrial Cancer.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Akemi T WijayabahuDivision of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD 20850, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3659-3701
Jennifer K McGee-AvilaDivision of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD 20850, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0425-015X
Meredith S ShielsDivision of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD 20850, USA.
Alfonsus Adrian H HarsonoDivision of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL 35233, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1611-258X
Rebecca C ArendDivision of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL 35233, USA.
Megan A ClarkeDivision of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD 20850, USA.

Funding

CERVICAL CANCER AND HUMAN PAPILLOMAVIRUS (HPV) INFECTIONZ01CP010124 · NCI · DIVISION OF CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY AND GENETICS · PI SCHIFFMAN, MARK · 1996 to 2008
$3.0M
Intramural NIH HHS Z01 CP010124
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding socioeconomic factors contributing to uterine cancer survival disparities is crucial, especially given the increasing incidence of uterine cancer, which disproportionately impacts racial/ethnic groups. We investigated the impact of county-level socioeconomic factors on five-year survival rates of uterine cancer overall and by histology across race/ethnicity. We included 333,013 women aged ≥ 30 years with microscopically confirmed uterine cancers (2000-2018) from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results 22 database followed through 2019. Age-standardized five-year relative survival rates were compared within race/ethnicity and histology, examining the differences across tertiles of county-level percent (%) <high-school education, %<150 percent poverty, %unemployment, median household income, and %urbanicity. Overall age-adjusted five-year relative survival was 77.7%. Rates were lowest among those residing in the least advantaged counties (tertile 3) and highest among the most advantaged (tertile 1): education (74.7% vs. 80.2%), poverty (72.9% vs. 79.8%), unemployment (75.7% vs. 80.5%), and income (73.3% tertile 1 vs. 78.1% tertile 3). Impact of county-level socioeconomic characteristics on survival across histology was minimal. We observed considerable survival disparities among NH-Black and NH-Native American/Alaskan Native women, regardless of tumor and socioeconomic characteristics. These findings add to our understanding of how county-level socioeconomic characteristics affect uterine cancer survival inequalities among racial/ethnic groups.

Indexed as

five-year survivalhistologic subtyperace/ethnic disparityrace/ethnicitysocioeconomic statusuterine cancer

Identifiers

PMID39123474
PMCPMC11311553

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.