Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39123464›Full record

ArticleCancers2024

Proton Pencil Beam Scanning Facilitates the Safe Treatment of Extended Radiation Targets for Hodgkin Lymphoma: A Report from the Proton Collaborative Group Registry.

Maryam Ebadi, Mark Pankuch, Sean Boyer, John Chang, Craig Stevens, Matthew D Hall, Shaakir Hasan, James E Bates, Stella Flampouri, Adam J Kole and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Maryam EbadiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington and Radiation Oncology Division, Fred Hutch Cancer Center, Seattle, WA 98195, USA.
Mark PankuchNorthwestern Medicine Proton Center, Warrenville, IL 60555, USA.
Sean BoyerNorthwestern Medicine Proton Center, Warrenville, IL 60555, USA.
John ChangThe Oklahoma Proton Center, Oklahoma City, OK 73142, USA.
Craig StevensDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Corewell Health William Beaumont University Hospital, Royal Oak, MI 48073, USA.
Matthew D HallMiami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, FL 33176, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8768-3577
Shaakir HasanNew York Proton Center, New York, NY 10035, USA.
James E BatesEmory University Hospital Midtown, Atlanta, GA 30308, USA.
Stella FlampouriEmory School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA.
Adam J KoleDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL 35294, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7931-8841
Pranshu MohindraUniversity Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4873-7496
Carl RossiCalifornia Protons Cancer Therapy Center, San Diego, CA 92121, USA.
Parag SanghviDepartment of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, UC San Diego School of Medicine, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA.
Lisa McGeeDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ 85054, USA.
Zaker RanaMaryland Proton Treatment Center, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA.
Yolanda D TsengDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington and Radiation Oncology Division, Fred Hutch Cancer Center, Seattle, WA 98195, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4070-346X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Because proton beam therapy (PBT) can lower the dose of radiation to the heart, lungs, and breast, it is an established radiation modality for patients with Hodgkin lymphoma (HL). Pencil beam scanning (PBS) PBT facilitates the treatment of more extensive targets. This may be especially of value for lymphoma patients who require RT to both mediastinal and axillary targets, defined here as extended target RT (ETRT), given the target distribution and need to minimize the lung, heart, and breast dose. Using the Proton Collaborative Group registry, we identified patients with HL treated with PBT to both their mediastinum and axilla, for which DICOM-RT was available. All patients were treated with PBS. To evaluate the dosimetric impact of PBS, we compared delivered PBS plans with VMAT butterfly photon plans optimized to have the same target volume coverage, when feasible. Between 2016 and 2021, twelve patients (median 26 years) received PBS ETRT (median 30.6 Gy (RBE)). Despite the large superior/inferior (SI, median 22.2 cm) and left/right (LR, median 22.8 cm) extent of the ETRT targets, all patients were treated with one isocenter except for two patients (both with SI and LR > 30 cm). Most commonly, anterior beams, with or without posterior beams, were used. Compared to photons, PBS had greater target coverage, better conformity, and lower dose heterogeneity while achieving lower doses to the lungs and heart, but not to the breast. No acute grade 3+ toxicities were reported, including pneumonitis. Proton ETRT in this small cohort was safely delivered with PBS and was associated with an improved sparing of the heart and lungs compared to VMAT.

Indexed as

extended target radiation therapypencil beam scanningproton beam therapy

Identifiers

PMID39123464
PMCPMC11311484

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.