ArticleCancers2024
Comparison between Three Radiomics Models and Clinical Nomograms for Prediction of Lymph Node Involvement in PCa Patients Combining Clinical and Radiomic Features.
Article in Cancers, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The diagnostic value of radiomics-based machine learning for lymph node metastasis in prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Pooled it
- Explainable artificial intelligence reveals key surgical parameters in robot-assisted and open radical prostatectomy.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- PSMA PET in Lymph Node Staging of Prostate Cancer: From Diagnostic Accuracy to Clinical Decision-Making.Cancers · 2026Review
- Development and Validation of an AI-Assisted Predictive Model Integrating R2* Mapping and Clinical Indicators for Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer.Cancer medicine · 2026Article
- Diagnostic accuracy of MRI radiomics in predicting lymph node metastasis in prostate cancer: A systematic review.European journal of radiology open · 2025Review
- Prevalence and Significance of Incidental Findings in Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Prostate.Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.) · 2025Article
- Radiologic Assessment of Periprostatic Fat as an Indicator of Prostate Cancer Risk on Multiparametric MRI.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Transperineal Free-Hand Prostate Fusion Biopsy with AI-Driven Auto-Contouring: First Results of a Prospective Study.Cancers · 2025Article
- Promising Results About the Possibility to Identify Prostate Cancer Patients Employing a Random Forest Classifier: A Preliminary Study Preoperative Patients Selection.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Clinical-radiomics hybrid modeling outperforms conventional models: machine learning enhances stratification of adverse prognostic features in prostate cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- Evaluating the performance of ChatGPT in patient consultation and image-based preliminary diagnosis in thyroid eye disease.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeWe aim to compare the performance of three different radiomics models (logistic regression (LR), random forest (RF), and support vector machine (SVM)) and clinical nomograms (Briganti, MSKCC, Yale, and Roach) for predicting lymph node involvement (LNI) in prostate cancer (PCa) patients. MATERIALS AND
methodsThe retrospective study includes 95 patients who underwent mp-MRI and radical prostatectomy for PCa with pelvic lymphadenectomy. Imaging data (intensity in T2, DWI, ADC, and PIRADS), clinical data (age and pre-MRI PSA), histological data (Gleason score, TNM staging, histological type, capsule invasion, seminal vesicle invasion, and neurovascular bundle involvement), and clinical nomograms (Yale, Roach, MSKCC, and Briganti) were collected for each patient. Manual segmentation of the index lesions was performed for each patient using an open-source program (3D SLICER). Radiomic features were extracted for each segmentation using the Pyradiomics library for each sequence (T2, DWI, and ADC). The features were then selected and used to train and test three different radiomics models (LR, RF, and SVM) independently using ChatGPT software (v 4o). The coefficient value of each feature was calculated (significant value for coefficient ≥ ±0.5). The predictive performance of the radiomics models and clinical nomograms was assessed using accuracy and area under the curve (AUC) (significant value for
resultsThis study identified 343 features per patient (330 radiomics features and 13 clinical features). The most significant features were T2_nodulofirstordervariance and T2_nodulofirstorderkurtosis. The highest predictive performance was achieved by the RF model with DWI (accuracy 86%, AUC 0.89) and ADC (accuracy 89%, AUC 0.67). Clinical nomograms demonstrated satisfactory but lower predictive performance compared to the RF model in the DWI sequences.
conclusionsAmong the prediction models developed using integrated data (radiomics and semantics), RF shows slightly higher diagnostic accuracy in terms of AUC compared to clinical nomograms in PCa lymph node involvement prediction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.